Dr BK Jaiswal's Practice

On this page

• Overview
• Assessing needs
• Delivering evidence-based care and treatment
• How staff, teams and services work together
• Supporting people to live healthier lives
• Monitoring and improving outcomes
• Consent to care and treatment

We looked for evidence staff involved people in decisions about their care and treatment and provided them with advice and support. Staff regularly reviewed people’s care and worked with other services to achieve this. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Assessing needs during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

We did not look at Delivering evidence-based care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

The 2025 National GP Patient Survey results showed people were informed about their care and treatment and what the next steps were. Eighty one percent of patients knew what the next step would be after contacting the practice. This was in line with the national and local average results. Since the inspection, GPPS have published new results in July 2026. The new data suggests a slight improvement with 85% of people responding positively.

Staff supported people to manage their health and wellbeing. The practices local primary care network (PCN) supported the practice and carried out an NHS campaign to increase the uptake of health checks.

Staff identified and responded to health risks such as end-of-life needs, emerging long-term conditions, carer responsibilities and supported national health priorities, including smoking cessation and obesity reduction. Staff referred patients to a social prescriber, the local gym and a dietician. The leaders told us they had almost met their target for over 40 years health check for the year 2025 to 2026.

The practice's cervical screening uptake in 2024 was below the national target of 80%. However, the practice submitted unverified data for cervical screening in 2025/26 which showed they had improved and were now slightly below the national target.

Childhood immunisation uptake for 2024/25 was also below the World Health Organization (WHO) target. The practice provided unverified data that demonstrated they had made improvements and had achieved the WHO target of 90% for all but one area in 2025/26.

The practice submitted unverified data showing maximum achievement for atrial fibrillation, asthma, secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Achievement for diabetes and hypertension was slightly below maximum levels.

The practice also submitted unverified data from Interface Clinical Services relating to asthma, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Analysis highlighted potential concerns regarding diabetes management, asthma safety indicators, and chronic kidney disease monitoring.

We did not look at Consent to care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.