• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Taunton PET CT

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Musgrove Park Hospital, Parkfield Drive, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 5DA 0845 045 0103

Provided and run by:
Alliance Medical Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment of Diagnostic imaging

We undertook an onsite assessment at Taunton PET CT on 25 June 2025. We continued the assessment with online interviews until 3 July 2025.

We rated the service as good. We found improvements had been made since our last inspection and the breaches had been met.

Staff now received mandatory training in subjects appropriate for their role. The service now shared learning from incidents. Pause and check guidance was performed for every patient before administering injections or scanning the patient. The service had an up-to-date risk register which was reflective of the risks faced in the carrying on of the regulated activity. Governance arrangements for the oversight of staff training was accurate and effective.

During an assessment of the hospital overall

We assessed Taunton PET CT from 25 June to 3 July 2025.

We assessed 1 assessment service group at this location due to an aged rating. We previously inspected the service in 2021 and rated them requires improvement. We found that the service had made improvements and met the breaches found at the previous inspection. We assessed Diagnostic Imaging where we assessed all 33 quality statements.

Taunton PET CT was registered with CQC in December 2017 to deliver the regulated activities: Diagnostic and screening procedures. The service had a Nominated Individual.

We rated the location as Good. 

03 November 2021

During a routine inspection

This service had not been previously inspected. We rated it as requires improvement because:

  • The service provided mandatory training in key skills to all staff and but not all staff completed it. Some training was considered optional but should have been mandatory. Lessons learned from safety incidents were not always disseminated to staff effectively. Not all staff were up to date with training associated with the administration of radiopharmaceuticals.
  • Governance processes were not always effective. Documentation allowing nuclear medicine practitioners to inject, and order radiopharmaceuticals did not reflect up-to-date licence numbers. There was no evidence current risks recorded on the risk register were reviewed and updated in line with company policy.

However:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in most key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. Staff knew how to report patient safety incidents.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients. Scanning services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders had the skills and abilities to run the service. They understood and managed the priorities and issues the service faced. They were visible and approachable in the service for patients and staff. They supported staff to develop their skills and take on more senior roles. The service had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and a strategy to turn it into action. The vision and strategy were focused on sustainability of services and aligned to local plans within the wider health economy. Staff at all levels were clear about their roles and accountabilities and had opportunities to meet, discuss and learn from the performance of the service.