- Community substance misuse service
CGL Norfolk Alcohol and Drug Behavioural Change Service
Assessment report published 4 September 2025
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Person-centred Care
- Care provision, Integration and continuity
- Providing Information
- Listening to and involving people
- Equity in access
- Equity in experiences and outcomes
- Planning for the future
Responsive
We rated responsive as good. We assessed 1 quality statement. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Person-centred Care
We did not look at Person-centred Care during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.
Care provision, Integration and continuity
We did not look at Care provision, Integration and continuity during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.
Providing Information
We did not look at Providing Information during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.
Listening to and involving people
We did not look at Listening to and involving people during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.
Equity in access
We did not look at Equity in access during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.
Equity in experiences and outcomes
The service actively sought out and listened to information about people who were most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes. They tailored the care, support and treatment in response to this.
Overall, 100% of staff had completed introduction to equality, diversity, and inclusion training. Staff told us the service was inclusive of people from diverse backgrounds.
The service could provide interpreters for people if required. Staff also made information leaflets available in languages spoken by people who used the service.
The provider had policies in place to ensure people were treated equally. There were opportunities for people to give feedback about their care and support.
Planning for the future
We did not look at Planning for the future during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.