• Care Home
  • Care home

Cedar Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Culford, Bury St. Edmunds, IP28 6DX (01284) 728744

Provided and run by:
Orion Healthcare Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at Cedar Lodge. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

1 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Cedar Lodge is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 25 people. The service provides support to older people, people living with dementia and younger adults. At the time of our inspection there were 18 people using the service. Accommodation is over two floors and there is a shaft lift to access the upper floor.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider’s governance systems in monitoring the quality and safety of the service were still ineffective. The provider was reactive to events that arose and did not use effective systems to proactively identify risk with planning for improvement of the service and meet challenges that arose. One example was a risk posed to people and staff in obtaining timely insurance. There was a reliance on other system partners such as the local authority to support the service to resolve this.

Since our last inspection the registered manager has worked along with the support of partner agencies to improve Cedar Lodge. However, the provider has continued not to have effective oversight of the service. There continued to be a lack of provider audits with action plans and timely completion of essential works needed. For example, in relation to repairs and upkeep of the premises. There was minimal evidence of provider input in monitoring the service.

Risks to people identified at our last inspection had been mitigated to a degree. With support from the local authority a system was now in place. Risk management plans had been reviewed and updated, but action to keep people as safe as they could be had not been appropriately taken. For example; to mitigate the risk of falls over low banisters, whilst we were told by the registered manager wood had been purchased, banisters had not been installed.

The environment was cleaner. A deep clean had taken place. Additional staff were employed to maintain cleanliness at weekends. However, we had to point out to the registered manager continued cleanliness concerns, such as dirty toilet raiser seats, a soiled shower chair and stained bedding. The registered manager responded to our identified shortfalls and ensured these were dealt with.

The environment had not been upgraded to maintain cleanliness. There were still damp and mould in a bathroom, flooring had not been replaced in any bathroom, en-suite or toilets. Flaking paint was still evident in an en-suite shower. The laundry room still had no wash hand basin. This meant people and staff were still at risk of cross infection. Basic maintenance had taken place such as painting five bedrooms.

Additional care staff have been recruited and resident numbers have reduced. This had led to people being more appropriately supported and cared for.

The registered manager had worked well with the local authority safeguarding team and had acted upon their recommendations. This had led to more effective safeguarding systems in place to protect people from the risk of harm or abuse. Best interest assessors have been involved in review of people’s needs and up-skilling staff which meant consent was better understood and documented.

People were better supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the provider had accessed systems of support through the local authority to better address their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act.

For more information, please read the detailed findings section of this report. If you are reading this as a separate summary, the full report can be found on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was inadequate (published 24 March 2022).

At our last inspection we found breaches of the regulations in relation to keeping people safe from avoidable harm, a lack of staff and records such as risk assessments and care plans were not adequate. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to tell us what they would do and by when to improve.

Outcome

This service has been in Special Measures since 24 March 2022. During this inspection the provider demonstrated that some improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate in safe and well led. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

At our last inspection we recommended that people should have individual information relating to medicine administration. At this inspection we found people had medicine profiles that explained to staff how best to support each individual with their medicines.

Why we inspected

We carried out an unannounced targeted inspection of this service on 1 August 2022.

We undertook this inspection as we had been made aware that the service was struggling to obtain insurance and to check if the provider had made improvements to meet the legal requirements from our last inspection. This report only covers our findings in relation to the key questions safe and well-led.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

The overall rating for the service has changed from inadequate to requires improvement. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cedar Lodge on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Enforcement and recommendations

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.

We have found ongoing breaches in relation to ineffective management and governance of this service and ineffective management oversight of cleanliness and hygiene at this inspection.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

15 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Cedar Lodge is a residential care home providing personal and accommodation. The service provides support for up to 25 people in one adapted building, across two floors. At the time of our inspection there were 24 people using the service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider’s governance systems in monitoring the quality and safety of the service were ineffective and did not identify the shortfalls we found at this inspection. Risks to people's safety associated with their care and treatment and operation of the premises had not always been identified.

People were at risk from a lack of staff to meet their needs, inadequate cleaning regimes and a poorly maintained environment. There was a lack of systems in place to identify the risks relating to; access to the stairs, scalding from hot water outlets and inadequate infection control monitoring.

The environment was not clean and well maintained to ensure people lived in a safe, homely environment. Areas of the service were in a state of disrepair and in need of cleaning. We asked for a schedule of works planned to bring the environment up to standard, but this had not been developed at the time of our inspection.

Action was not always taken to safeguard people from the risk of harm. The provider did not have effective safeguarding systems in place to protect people from the risk of abuse. Safeguarding concerns had not always been identified and reported to the local authority.

Not everyone had a care and risk management plan in place. Care plans were basic and lacked details of people's assessed needs including medical and mental health conditions. There was a lack of risk management plans in place for people at risk of self harm, choking, acquiring infections, diabetes, pressure wounds and their catheter care. This meant staff were not routinely given sufficient guidance to manage complex care needs in line with best practice guidance.

People were not assessed to check their capacity to make particular decisions when this was in doubt. Records were not maintained to show how decisions were made in people's best interests. People were supported to have some choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; however, the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

We recommend the registered manager put in place medicines profiles which describe the conditions medicines were prescribed to treat and how people chose to take their medicines.

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good [published 28 June 2019].

Why we inspected

Prior to our inspection we received concerns in relation to the oversight and management of the service including a lack of infection control, maintenance of the building and staffing including the quality of staff training. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe and well led sections of this full report.

The overall rating for the service has changed from Good to Inadequate based on the findings of this inspection.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cedar Lodge on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.

We have identified breaches in relation to safe care and treatment, staffing, safeguarding people from the risk of abuse, infection control and ineffective oversight of and management of the service. Immediately after the inspection we wrote to the provider and requested they provide us

with urgent information telling us what they were going to do regarding the management of risks, staffing, infection control and ineffective government arrangements.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

Special Measures

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe. And there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it. And it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.

8 May 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: Cedar Lodge provides accommodation for older people, some of whom may have nursing needs or live with dementia. The service can accommodate up to 25 people. On the day of our inspection visit there were 23 people living at the service.

People’s experience of using this service:

We found a service on the cusp of improvement with many elements set to improve. There are environmental challenges that the new provider had started to overcome. There were improvements made that had yet to be imbedded and new initiatives and developments facilitated by the new owners were being embraced by the staff group.

People at this service were well cared for by dedicated staff. People benefited from good personal care. People using the service were relaxed with staff and the way staff interacted with people had a positive effect on their well-being. People were treated with kindness, respect and compassion and their privacy, dignity and independence were promoted.

People's communication needs were not always met as communication methods for people living with dementia had not been fully explored. People had a limited choice of activities which they could take part in. The environment at the service needed some further development to make it more supportive to people living with dementia. Plans were in place to improve upon this along with introducing a new electronic care planning system as the current system in use did not meet the needs of people and the service. Further developments were needed to fully address peoples end of life care.

We have made recommendations to the service about improving communication methods.

People’s feedback was consistently positive about the care, support and staff. People particularly liked the home because of the caring staff employed. One person told us, “I’d recommend it to anyone. They have been first class.”

People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Systems and process in place at the service kept people safe in all areas of their care including the

administration of medicines.

There were enough staff on shift to support people and robust recruitment checks were carried out before staff started working at the service. Staff received induction, training and supervision to ensure that they had the right skills and abilities to support people.

People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet.

The acting manager had a system of audits in place that were used to monitor and improve the quality of the service. Complaints were responded to appropriately by the acting manager.

Rating at last inspection: This is the first ratings inspection since the service registered on 15 August 2018.

Why we inspected: We inspected this service because it required a rating to be published.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk