• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Hospital

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

RJAH Orthopaedic & District Hospital, Twmpath Lane, Gobowen, Shropshire, SY10 7AG (01691) 404358

Provided and run by:
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

All Inspections

During an assessment of Critical care

The on-site assessment took place on the 23 May 2025. The assessment took place due to overdue inspection and out of date ratings. We have rated the service asGood overall.

The high dependency unit at The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust provides a service to patients who need high dependency care (described as level two). Care is provided to patients who have undergone extensive or complicated orthopaedic surgery, or who have been identified at their pre-operative assessment clinic as maybe requiring closer post-operative nursing care. The high dependency unit also provides care to patients who are being nursed on the general wards and whose condition is deteriorating clinically or are causing concern. Patients are also admitted in the event of surgical emergencies.

An outreach service is provided within the trust, which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The team follows up all patients upon discharge from the high dependency unit to one of the wards, during service hours, to ensure good clinical progress continues. They attend to deteriorating patients on the general and surgical wards. The outreach role is a dual one as they also provide nursing cover to the whole hospital at night.

As of 30 March 2025, there were 4 adult critical care beds, of which 1 was occupied. Between 25 November 2024 and 30 March 2025, the trust has had between four to six open beds with an average monthly bed occupancy rate of 58%. The trust has had a comparable number of open critical beds and bed occupancy, over the past three years. Between January 2024 and January 2025, the High Dependency Unit (HDU) Hospital had an average of 21.96 care hours per patient day.

April 2025 figures:

Weekday bed occupancy at 2pm 48.51% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at 2pm 40.63% against target 87.00%

Weekday bed occupancy at midnight 66.67% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at midnight 38.71% against target 87.00%.

During an assessment of Critical care

The on-site assessment took place on the 23 May 2025. The assessment took place due to overdue inspection and out of date ratings. We have rated the service asGood overall.

The high dependency unit at The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust provides a service to patients who need high dependency care (described as level two). Care is provided to patients who have undergone extensive or complicated orthopaedic surgery, or who have been identified at their pre-operative assessment clinic as maybe requiring closer post-operative nursing care. The high dependency unit also provides care to patients who are being nursed on the general wards and whose condition is deteriorating clinically or are causing concern. Patients are also admitted in the event of surgical emergencies.

An outreach service is provided within the trust, which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The team follows up all patients upon discharge from the high dependency unit to one of the wards, during service hours, to ensure good clinical progress continues. They attend to deteriorating patients on the general and surgical wards. The outreach role is a dual one as they also provide nursing cover to the whole hospital at night.

As of 30 March 2025, there were 4 adult critical care beds, of which 1 was occupied. Between 25 November 2024 and 30 March 2025, the trust has had between four to six open beds with an average monthly bed occupancy rate of 58%. The trust has had a comparable number of open critical beds and bed occupancy, over the past three years. Between January 2024 and January 2025, the High Dependency Unit (HDU) Hospital had an average of 21.96 care hours per patient day.

April 2025 figures:

Weekday bed occupancy at 2pm 48.51% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at 2pm 40.63% against target 87.00%

Weekday bed occupancy at midnight 66.67% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at midnight 38.71% against target 87.00%.

During an assessment of Surgery

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has approximately 200 inpatient and critical care beds across 9 wards.

The hospital is a single site hospital based in Oswestry, Shropshire. It provides specialist and routine orthopaedic care to its local catchment area, and specialist services both regionally and nationally. The hospital is a specialist centre for the treatment of spinal injuries and disorders and provides specialist treatment for children with musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the trust works with partner organisations to provide specialist treatment for bone tumours and community based rheumatology services. The trust is part of the National Orthopaedic Alliance (NOA), an acute care collaboration vanguard designed to improve orthopaedic care quality across England.

The surgical services at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust are comprised of 5 inpatient wards:

Kenyon ward – 22 beds

Powys ward – 22 beds

Clwyd ward – 22 beds

Ludlow ward – 16 beds (private patients) NOT assessed

Oswald ward - oncology ward, 10 beds en-suite. NOT assessed.

The trust’s theatre suite comprises of 12 operating theatres, including 2 day-surgery theatres located in the Menzies unit.

During the inspection we visited 3 wards, the surgical admissions and day case unit, the operating theatres and the recovery unit.

We spoke with 29 patients and visitors and 40 members of staff. These included senior managers, all grades of nursing staff, healthcare assistants, domestic staff, consultant surgeons, anaesthetists, and other grades of doctors.

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019. Where it was rated good overall.

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025.

We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions and 33 quality statements. The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients.

There were effective systems to ensure that standards of cleanliness and hygiene were maintained.

The service had enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

The service managed patient safety incidents well. Staff recognised incidents and reported them appropriately.

The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.

All staff worked together as a team to benefit patients. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals supported each other to provide good care.

Patients told us they felt involved in their own care and treatment as staff took time to explain what was happening and why.

We saw examples where staff had gone above and beyond what was expected to support patients.

The trust planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people.

The service treated concerns and complaints seriously, investigated them and learned lessons from the results, and shared these with all staff.

Managers and senior leaders had the right skills to perform their roles effectively.

The trust had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action developed with involvement from staff, patients, and key groups representing the local community.

There was evidence of improved culture across the service and there was strong leadership. Staff told us they felt supported, respected, valued and were proud to work at the trust.

The service was committed to improving services by learning from when things went well and when they went wrong, promoting training, research, and innovation.

During an assessment of Surgery

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has approximately 200 inpatient and critical care beds across 9 wards.

The hospital is a single site hospital based in Oswestry, Shropshire. It provides specialist and routine orthopaedic care to its local catchment area, and specialist services both regionally and nationally. The hospital is a specialist centre for the treatment of spinal injuries and disorders and provides specialist treatment for children with musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the trust works with partner organisations to provide specialist treatment for bone tumours and community based rheumatology services. The trust is part of the National Orthopaedic Alliance (NOA), an acute care collaboration vanguard designed to improve orthopaedic care quality across England.

The surgical services at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust are comprised of 5 inpatient wards:

Kenyon ward – 22 beds

Powys ward – 22 beds

Clwyd ward – 22 beds

Ludlow ward – 16 beds (private patients) NOT assessed

Oswald ward - oncology ward, 10 beds en-suite. NOT assessed.

The trust’s theatre suite comprises of 12 operating theatres, including 2 day-surgery theatres located in the Menzies unit.

During the inspection we visited 3 wards, the surgical admissions and day case unit, the operating theatres and the recovery unit.

We spoke with 29 patients and visitors and 40 members of staff. These included senior managers, all grades of nursing staff, healthcare assistants, domestic staff, consultant surgeons, anaesthetists, and other grades of doctors.

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019. Where it was rated good overall.

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025.

We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions and 33 quality statements. The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients.

There were effective systems to ensure that standards of cleanliness and hygiene were maintained.

The service had enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

The service managed patient safety incidents well. Staff recognised incidents and reported them appropriately.

The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.

All staff worked together as a team to benefit patients. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals supported each other to provide good care.

Patients told us they felt involved in their own care and treatment as staff took time to explain what was happening and why.

We saw examples where staff had gone above and beyond what was expected to support patients.

The trust planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people.

The service treated concerns and complaints seriously, investigated them and learned lessons from the results, and shared these with all staff.

Managers and senior leaders had the right skills to perform their roles effectively.

The trust had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action developed with involvement from staff, patients, and key groups representing the local community.

There was evidence of improved culture across the service and there was strong leadership. Staff told us they felt supported, respected, valued and were proud to work at the trust.

The service was committed to improving services by learning from when things went well and when they went wrong, promoting training, research, and innovation.

During an assessment of the hospital overall

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019.  Where it was rated good overall. 

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025. We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions. 

The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients. During this inspection we also inspected critical care core service. 

During an assessment of the hospital overall

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019. Where it was rated good overall.

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025. We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions.

The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients. During this inspection we also inspected critical care core service.

During an assessment of Critical care

The on-site assessment took place on the 23 May 2025. The assessment took place due to overdue inspection and out of date ratings. We have rated the service as Good overall.

The high dependency unit at The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust provides a service to patients who need high dependency care (described as level two). Care is provided to patients who have undergone extensive or complicated orthopaedic surgery, or who have been identified at their pre-operative assessment clinic as maybe requiring closer post-operative nursing care. The high dependency unit also provides care to patients who are being nursed on the general wards and whose condition is deteriorating clinically or are causing concern. Patients are also admitted in the event of surgical emergencies.

An outreach service is provided within the trust, which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The team follows up all patients upon discharge from the high dependency unit to one of the wards, during service hours, to ensure good clinical progress continues. They attend to deteriorating patients on the general and surgical wards. The outreach role is a dual one as they also provide nursing cover to the whole hospital at night.

As of 30 March 2025, there were 4 adult critical care beds, of which 1 was occupied. Between 25 November 2024 and 30 March 2025, the trust has had between four to six open beds with an average monthly bed occupancy rate of 58%. The trust has had a comparable number of open critical beds and bed occupancy, over the past three years. Between January 2024 and January 2025, the High Dependency Unit (HDU) Hospital had an average of 21.96 care hours per patient day.

April 2025 figures:

Weekday bed occupancy at 2pm 48.51% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at 2pm 40.63% against target 87.00%

Weekday bed occupancy at midnight 66.67% against target 87.00%

Weekend bed occupancy at midnight 38.71% against target 87.00%.

During an assessment of Surgery

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has approximately 200 inpatient and critical care beds across 9 wards.

The hospital is a single site hospital based in Oswestry, Shropshire. It provides specialist and routine orthopaedic care to its local catchment area, and specialist services both regionally and nationally. The hospital is a specialist centre for the treatment of spinal injuries and disorders and provides specialist treatment for children with musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the trust works with partner organisations to provide specialist treatment for bone tumours and community based rheumatology services. The trust is part of the National Orthopaedic Alliance (NOA), an acute care collaboration vanguard designed to improve orthopaedic care quality across England.

The surgical services at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust are comprised of 5 inpatient wards:

Kenyon ward – 22 beds

Powys ward – 22 beds

Clwyd ward – 22 beds

Ludlow ward – 16 beds (private patients) NOT assessed

Oswald ward - oncology ward, 10 beds en-suite. NOT assessed.

The trust’s theatre suite comprises of 12 operating theatres, including 2 day-surgery theatres located in the Menzies unit.

During the inspection we visited 3 wards, the surgical admissions and day case unit, the operating theatres and the recovery unit.

We spoke with 29 patients and visitors and 40 members of staff. These included senior managers, all grades of nursing staff, healthcare assistants, domestic staff, consultant surgeons, anaesthetists, and other grades of doctors.

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019. Where it was rated good overall.

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025.

We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions and 33 quality statements. The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients.

There were effective systems to ensure that standards of cleanliness and hygiene were maintained.

The service had enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

The service managed patient safety incidents well. Staff recognised incidents and reported them appropriately.

The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.

All staff worked together as a team to benefit patients. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals supported each other to provide good care.

Patients told us they felt involved in their own care and treatment as staff took time to explain what was happening and why.

We saw examples where staff had gone above and beyond what was expected to support patients.

The trust planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people.

The service treated concerns and complaints seriously, investigated them and learned lessons from the results, and shared these with all staff.

Managers and senior leaders had the right skills to perform their roles effectively.

The trust had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action developed with involvement from staff, patients, and key groups representing the local community.

There was evidence of improved culture across the service and there was strong leadership. Staff told us they felt supported, respected, valued and were proud to work at the trust.

The service was committed to improving services by learning from when things went well and when they went wrong, promoting training, research, and innovation.

14 to 21 Nov, 4 to 6 Dec 2018

During a routine inspection

Our rating of services improved. We rated it them as good because:

  • Our rating of safe was overall. Services managed patient safety incidents well. Services had sufficient numbers of permanent staff with the right qualifications, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and abuse. Services controlled infection risk well.

  • Our rating of effective was good overall. Services monitored the effectiveness of care and treatment and used the findings to improve them. Staff were competent to carry out their role. Patients were supported to live healthier lives and manage their own care and wellbeing needs where appropriate.

  • Our rating of caring was outstanding overall. Staff exceeded the expectations of patients and family members in their passion for patient care. Staff worked in a creative and innovative manner to provide exceptional, strong and caring emotional support that exceeded patients’ expectations to minimise their distress. Staff consistently involved and empowered patients and those close to them as active partners in their care and treatment.

  • Our rating of responsive was good overall. Services took account of patients’ individual needs and planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people and the specialist needs of people within the region who were living with spinal injuries.

  • Our rating of well-led was good overall. Managers at all levels in the trust had the right skills and abilities to run a service providing high quality sustainable care. There was a vision in place for what the trust wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action developed with involvement from staff, patients, and key groups representing the local community. Managers across the trust promoted a positive culture that supported and valued staff, creating a sense of common purpose based on shared values. The trust used a systematic approach to continually improve the quality of its services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care would flourish.

13 November 2013

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection was carried out by a team of four including a specialist advisor and an Expert by Experience. We visited three wards. We spoke with patients or their relatives and staff on all of the wards we visited and spent time observing how care and support was delivered. We also looked at patients' notes and care plans.

Patients and their relatives on the Children's ward were particularly complimentary about the service they received in the hospital. One patient told us, 'It's happy and fun here'. A relative of another patient told us, 'It's absolutely brilliant'. On other wards, patients were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences although one patient was unhappy about the care they had received after an operation.

We found that measures in place to keep people safe were in place across the hospital but were particularly good on the children's ward. Information was available in language that children could understand and patients told us that they felt very safe on the ward.

All the patients we spoke with told us that doctors had explained the benefits and risks of their operations in great detail. We saw that consent forms had been fully completed and signed. Patients also told us that staff asked for their verbal agreement before carrying out treatment or care on the wards.

We found that there were generally enough qualified staff on duty to provide good care for the number of patients accommodated. However, two nurses mentioned that it could be difficult to find a doctor on a Sunday to sign discharge notes so that patients could go home.

12 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We inspected three wards; spoke with 20 patients, 10 staff and four visitors.

People told us what it was like to be a patient in the hospital. They described how they were treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care.

People mainly shared positive experiences about the care, treatment and support they received. They said they were treated with dignity and respect and that staff responded to their needs. People's records we sampled were kept securely and reflected the knowledge that staff had about the needs of individuals within their care.

People told us they felt safe at the hospital. We saw good interactions that enabled people to feel secure and reassured. Staff demonstrated an understanding of the different forms of abuse and knew the procedure to follow if they suspected abuse.

There were sufficient levels of staffing available on the three wards on the day that we inspected. However, people aired some dissatisfaction in this area, which the trust had identified as an area requiring improvement. One person told us, 'I ask to go to bed early just so I'm in bed and not hanging around waiting for staff.'

The trust informed us that action was being taken to address the staffing structure in the wards we visited.

The trust monitored formal complaints, investigated any poor practice and improved the service by learning from outcomes so that people received appropriate care.

7 April 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that their choices, independence, human rights, dignity and privacy were considered and respected. They felt they were supported to make decisions about their care and influence how the service is run.

Processes were in place to ensure that people were able to give consent to their care and people said that staff asked permission before carrying out any care with them.

People considered that they were involved in pre-operative assessments of care and were aware that they had a care pathway record. They told us that the attitude of staff was good and they felt safe and well cared for in the hospital. Comments about food and drink were favourable and all felt they had enough to eat.

Cleanliness and tidiness was reported to be very good. All people spoken with liked the hospital and said the environment was very nice to be in.

They said that staff made them feel very at ease and were skilled at making them feel less anxious about treatment. People said that staff were very kind and certainly seemed to know what they were doing. People had confidence that staff would do the right thing for them.

Visitors said that staff tried their hardest to sort things out and kept at it until a suitable outcome was achieved. They said they were able to make comments about the service and understood that they could complain formally.