• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Hospital

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

RJAH Orthopaedic & District Hospital, Twmpath Lane, Gobowen, Shropshire, SY10 7AG (01691) 404358

Provided and run by:
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Report from 14 October 2025 assessment

Ratings - Surgery

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has approximately 200 inpatient and critical care beds across 9 wards.

The hospital is a single site hospital based in Oswestry, Shropshire. It provides specialist and routine orthopaedic care to its local catchment area, and specialist services both regionally and nationally. The hospital is a specialist centre for the treatment of spinal injuries and disorders and provides specialist treatment for children with musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the trust works with partner organisations to provide specialist treatment for bone tumours and community based rheumatology services. The trust is part of the National Orthopaedic Alliance (NOA), an acute care collaboration vanguard designed to improve orthopaedic care quality across England.

The surgical services at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust are comprised of 5 inpatient wards:

Kenyon ward – 22 beds

Powys ward – 22 beds

Clwyd ward – 22 beds

Ludlow ward – 16 beds (private patients) NOT assessed

Oswald ward - oncology ward, 10 beds en-suite. NOT assessed.

The trust’s theatre suite comprises of 12 operating theatres, including 2 day-surgery theatres located in the Menzies unit.

During the inspection we visited 3 wards, the surgical admissions and day case unit, the operating theatres and the recovery unit.

We spoke with 29 patients and visitors and 40 members of staff. These included senior managers, all grades of nursing staff, healthcare assistants, domestic staff, consultant surgeons, anaesthetists, and other grades of doctors.

We last inspected the hospital in November and December 2019. Where it was rated good overall.

We carried out this announced inspection on the 22 and 23 May 2025.

We inspected this service using our single assessment framework and looked at all the key questions and 33 quality statements. The main service provided by the hospital was surgery for adult patients.

There were effective systems to ensure that standards of cleanliness and hygiene were maintained.

The service had enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

The service managed patient safety incidents well. Staff recognised incidents and reported them appropriately.

The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.

All staff worked together as a team to benefit patients. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals supported each other to provide good care.

Patients told us they felt involved in their own care and treatment as staff took time to explain what was happening and why.

We saw examples where staff had gone above and beyond what was expected to support patients.

The trust planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people.

The service treated concerns and complaints seriously, investigated them and learned lessons from the results, and shared these with all staff.

Managers and senior leaders had the right skills to perform their roles effectively.

The trust had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action developed with involvement from staff, patients, and key groups representing the local community.

There was evidence of improved culture across the service and there was strong leadership. Staff told us they felt supported, respected, valued and were proud to work at the trust.

The service was committed to improving services by learning from when things went well and when they went wrong, promoting training, research, and innovation.

People's experience of this service

Overall, people's experience of the service was positive. Patients and relatives spoke positively about staff, who were kind, explained their care and treatment, answered call bells quickly and provided pain relief when required. Patients consistently rated feeling able to talk to staff and feeling they were treated with dignity and respect above the national average in surveys. We viewed a number of thank you cards from patients and their loved ones on display.