- Homecare service
St Edmunds
Assessment report published 11 May 2026
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Person-centred Care
- Care provision, Integration and continuity
- Providing Information
- Listening to and involving people
- Equity in access
- Equity in experiences and outcomes
- Planning for the future
Responsive
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Person-centred Care
The provider made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs.
People told us they were happy with the care provided. They were involved in care planning with regular reviews to ensure information was kept up to date. Staff were passionate about providing person-centred care. Visit records showed staff were working in a person-centred way. We spoke with the registered manager about adding more information to care plans to reflect this.
Care provision, Integration and continuity
The provider understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity.
People told us they received good, consistent care from staff who understood their diverse health needs, choices, and wishes. One person said, “I get on well with the carers. I see 6 different ones. We get on really well.”
Providing Information
The provider supplied appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats that were tailored to individual needs.
Information could be shared in a range of formats such as easy read, braille, British Sign Language (BSL), and large print. The provider was also able to access translation and interpreter services for people. Staff understood people’s communication needs and supported people to express themselves.
Listening to and involving people
The provider made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. Staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result.
There was a robust system for logging, recording, and investigating complaints. Where people had raised concerns, these had been responded to appropriately.
The provider sought feedback and recorded compliments from people who had used the service. Comments included, “Excellent and very helpful and understanding” and “Provided with much needed confidence after hospital stay.”
Equity in access
The provider made sure that people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it.
People were supported to access external healthcare professionals, where required. Staff knew how to contact health or social care professionals for support.
Equity in experiences and outcomes
Staff and leaders actively listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this.
Staff and the management team understood people had a right to be treated equally, fairly, and to receive care and support that met their specific needs. Training records showed staff had received equality and diversity training as part of their role to help them make sure people were not subjected to discriminatory behaviours and practices.
People received good outcomes. Staff assisted people to increase their daily living skills and independence. People’s care could be increased or decreased as required, dependent on people's current needs. Records evidenced people had been referred to appropriate services if further health and social care support was required.
Planning for the future
People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.
Staff had completed end of life training and the service had links with the local hospice. A staff member said, “I feel we provide a good service and can help people pass away peacefully and with dignity with us and I am so proud of the team for that.”