• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

251 Soho Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, West Midlands, B21 9RY 0844 693 0425

Provided and run by:
Modality Medical Services Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham, you can give feedback on this service.

9 October 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham in June 2019, the overall rating was good. While no breaches of legal requirements were found, the service was rated as requires improvement for providing safe services. This was because we identified some areas where the provider should make improvements.

We carried out a focussed desk-based inspection of Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham on 9 October 2019 to check that the provider had made improvements in line with our recommendations. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Modality Medical Spa - Birmingham on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Since our comprehensive inspection in June 2019, the provider had reviewed and improved their processes for the management of fire risk.
  • The provider had reviewed their internal health and safety risk assessment to ensure it was specific to this service and that it adequately assessed and managed fire risks.
  • The provider had purchased suitable equipment to safely evacuate people with mobility difficulties in the event of a fire and provided staff with training on its use.
  • Staff had completed appropriate fire training.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

25 June 2019

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (This service was previously inspected on 18 September 2018).

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires improvement

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Modality Medical Spa – Birmingham on 25 June 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the provision of advice or treatment by a medical practitioner for minor surgical procedures. At Modality Medical Spa the aesthetic cosmetic treatments that are also provided are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, we were only able to inspect the treatment for minor surgery but not the aesthetic cosmetic services.

The service had a registered manager since August 2013. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During the inspection 12 people provided feedback about the service.

Our key findings were:

  • People using the service were positive about the way staff treated them and the overall service they received at the Spa.
  • The provider had responded appropriately to the concerns we had raised in our previous inspection and had improved processes such as checking patient identification. The provider had also improved their audit programme to include private patients, so they could monitor post-operative complication rates in private and NHS patients.
  • The provider monitored performance and quality and took action if they identified any concerns.
  • The Spa had effective communication processes to keep all staff updated with relevant information including learning from significant events and complaints.
  • We found people were able to access the service in a timely manner. Data the provider shared with us showed the service was meeting its targets for triage and waiting times.
  • Whilst the provider had completed a range of risk assessments to ensure staff and people using the service were kept safe. The service did not have access to a recent fire risk assessment and staff were unsure how they would assist patients with mobility difficulties in the event of a fire. Following the inspection, the provider sent us evidence to show they had responded to our concerns and put actions into place to mitigate risks.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • The provider should continue to review their fire safety training arrangements for the Spa and continue to take action to mitigate risks.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

18 September 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 18 September 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the provision of advice or treatment by a medical practitioner for minor surgical procedures. At Modality Medical Spa the aesthetic cosmetic treatments that are also provided are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, we were only able to inspect the treatment for minor surgery but not the aesthetic cosmetic services.

The service had a registered manager since August 2013. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During the inspection we spoke with one patient and received 30 completed CQC comment cards. All feedback from patients was positive and included that patients felt comfortable, staff were friendly and explained aftercare well. From the comment cards received we were not able to tell which comments related to the service that we were inspecting and which related to the services that were out of scope of inspection.

Our key findings were:

  • The service had effective systems and processes to keep patients safe. Polices were accessible to staff and well embedded. However, we found the service did not check the identity of private patients before carrying out a procedure. Following the inspection, the provider informed us they would be implementing a policy with immediate effect to confirm the identity of all private patients.
  • The service monitored post-operative complications in NHS patients and collected patient feedback to monitor how effective the service was.
  • From data provided, we saw patient feedback was positive and patients were likely to recommend the service.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • The lead clinician was experienced in Dermatology and minor surgery and continued to access clinical support and supervision as needed.
  • Data we viewed showed patients were satisfied with the choice of appointment offered and the service was meeting its own targets for treatment times.
  • The service had a clear leadership structure and staff were aware of their own roles and responsibilities.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Consider including private patients in the monitoring of post-operative complications to understand how effective services are and to make further improvements.