• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Bluebird Care (Derbyshire Dales & Amber Valley)

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

6 Bridge Street, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 1AX (01773) 880055

Provided and run by:
Kingfisher Business Solutions Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Bluebird Care (Derbyshire Dales & Amber Valley) on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Bluebird Care (Derbyshire Dales & Amber Valley), you can give feedback on this service.

14 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Bluebird Care (Derbyshire Dales & Amber Valley) is a service providing care and support to people in their own homes. At the time of the inspection the service was providing support to 45 people, but only 21 of those were receiving support with personal care. As the Care Quality Commission (CQC) does not regulate domestic support, this inspection relates only to people receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The leadership of the service was very good. People were without exception positive about the service and told us they would have no hesitation in recommending it. The service had a good quality assurance and monitoring systems to ensure people received safe care and treatment. These systems meant the management team were able to identify any shortfalls in the service and act quickly to rectify them.

Staff told us they were very proud to work for the service and felt extremely well supported in their roles. The management team had dedicated a lot of time and resources to staff training and development. Staff said they would recommend the service to family and friends who needed care and as a place to work.

People told us they enjoyed their independence whilst also getting the support they needed to live independently and be part of their local community.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People told us the service was safe. Staff knew how to recognise and report any concerns about people’s safety and welfare. Strong recruitment procedures helped to protect people against the risk of being supported by unsuitable staff. Risks to people safety and welfare were identified and managed.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update:

The last rating for this service was Good (published 23 January 2017).

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

28 September 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on the 28 September 2016. The provider was given 24 hours’ notice of the inspection, as this is a community service where people are often out during the day and we needed to make sure that the registered manager would be available to meet us. This was the first inspection of the service.

The service is a community service registered to provide care and support to people in their own homes, who live in the Derbyshire Dales and Amber Valley areas of Derbyshire. There were 35 people using the service on the day of inspection.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were safe from harm or abuse as staff had the knowledge and skills to safeguard them from harm. Risks were identified and managed in a way that kept people safe, whilst still promoting their independence and rights. There were sufficient staff available to provide the care that people needed as well as having time to talk and get-to-know people, which promoted their wellbeing.

People were cared for effectively, by staff who had the skills and knowledge to meet their individual needs. Staff received training and information on how to care for people with different health conditions. Staff were supported by the policies and processes in place and by the registered manager who was available for advice, support and guidance. Staff understood and followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and ensured people understood and consented to their care. People were supported to maintain a healthy balanced diet and to access community healthcare services where required.

People developed positive relationships with staff who cared for them and told us they looked forward to their visits. Staff enjoyed their roles and demonstrated compassion for the people they cared for. People were included in decisions about their care and staff listened to their ideas and preferences. Staff promoted people’s dignity and independence, and encouraged people to do as much as possible themselves during visits, whilst it was safe to do so.

Staff took time to get-to-know individuals and their life stories, preferences and aspirations. This enabled them to provide a personalised service for people based on their individual needs and abilities. People and staff were matched for suitability of character and personality as well as the skills of the carer, this enabled people to build trust and develop positive relationships with the staff who cared for them. People were consulted about their care experience and improvements were made where required.

The management team had an open and inclusive management style, where people and staff felt valued and empowered, to raise concerns or make suggestions on how to develop the service. There were positive links with the local community and the service operated from a ‘shop front’ office which enabled people to drop-in to see the staff or to enquire about care for a family member. There was good visible and accountable management and leadership of the service and a willingness to improve by the staff and management team. The quality assurance systems in place, provided opportunity for improvements to be identified and addressed. The management team were keen to develop the service, improve the quality of the care people experienced and had the knowledge and skills to do so.