• Care Home
  • Care home

St Mary's Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

1-3 The Crescent, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS5 6SD (01642) 820851

Provided and run by:
SUSASH Middlesbrough Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important:

We placed conditions on SUSAH Middlesbrough Ltd on 24 March 2026 for failing to meet the regulations related to good governance and consent at St Mary’s Care Home. The conditions we have placed stops St Mary’s Care Home admitting people with a learning disability and autistic people and requires managers to send regular progress reports to us.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 4 February to 10 March 2026.

The service is a nursing home providing support to adults of all ages living with learning and physical disabilities. It also supports older people and people living with a dementia.

This assessment was carried out because of the rating and breach of legal regulation found at our previous visit. These breaches related to the good governance and management of the service and person-centred care. At this latest assessment we found a breach of legal regulation in relation to consent and a continuing breach of regulation in relation to good governance.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The environment did not yet reflect best practice for smaller, homely settings and the current size and layout remained inconsistent with ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance. Action was being taken to address this, but it had not been embedded when we visited. Premises safety was not always assured and we found shortfalls in mental capacity and best interests decisions, including a serious incident where a person left the home unsupervised overnight. Governance systems had not consistently identified or addressed all concerns. Training on supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people was not yet at the required level for all staff, but action was taken to address this during the assessment.

People, relatives and staff were overwhelmingly positive about the day‑to‑day support, describing kind and caring staff, strong relationships and a culture where the registered manager and deputy were visible and approachable. People were supported to attend college, do voluntary work and take part in a wide range of activities, including work to develop independent living skills. External professionals reported notable improvements for some individuals and local authority reviewers and learning disability teams described a vibrant, friendly atmosphere.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 12 February to 12 May 2025. St Mary’s Care Home is registered to provide nursing and residential care. However, the service has never provided nursing care. The provider originally registered the service to provide support for people who were living with dementia, mental health needs or physical disabilities. They later added support of people with a learning disability or autism. At the time of this inspection, 53 people were living at the service with 35 people described as having a learning disability or autism.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

When the provider changed to a specialist service for people with learning disability or autism, this had not been reflected in the design of the service, staff practice and the environment. Neither the registered manager nor staff understood the principles of right care, right support and right culture or any best practice guidance of working with people who had a learning disability or autism. The provider governance arrangements had not identified action was needed to ensure the service changed and effectively supported this specialism.

Staff were empathetic and kind, they were attentive and consistently engaged people in conversation. For most people the service met their needs. However, people with needs related to their learning disability or autism did not always get their needs met and would sit unoccupied for long-periods of time.

Initially there were insufficient staff to provide individualised support for people but during the inspection the provider employed more staff and changed the shift patterns. Despite these improvements, we continued to find staff were not meeting the needs of people whose presenting need was their learning disability or autism.

Since starting the inspection, the provider has made positive changes to the environment to make this more appealing for the younger adults and installed a domestic kitchens and. However, the service still did not provide individualised support, which enabled people to lead meaningful goal-orientated lives.

At our last inspection in 2022 when the service predominantly supported older people, we rated the service as good. At this inspection we found the provider was in breach of legal regulations relating to providing person-centred care, the registered manager's skills to provide a specialist service and governance arrangements.

25 February 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

St Mary’s Care Home is a care home that provides personal care for up to 40 people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 40 people living in the home.

We found the following examples of good practice.

• Systems were in place to help prevent people, staff and visitors from catching or spreading infection.

• The environment was clean. Additional cleaning was taking place, including of frequently touched surfaces.

• Staff wore appropriate PPE and there were sufficient supplies. The registered manager carried out weekly checks to ensure the service always had enough PPE for staff to access. PPE stations were available around the home for ease of access for staff.

• Staff had undertaken training in putting on and taking off PPE and other COVID-19 related training such as hand hygiene and IPC.

• People and their relatives were supported to keep in contact using a range of technology as well as visits to the home and visiting pod situated within the grounds.

• People and staff participated in a regular testing programme, in line with government guidance.

• Appropriate vaccination status checks were in place.

7 January 2020

During a routine inspection

About the service

St. Mary’s Care Home provides personal and care and accommodation for up to 40 people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 38 people living in the home.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People felt very safe living in the home and with the support they received from staff. They were happy and spoke highly of staff members and the registered manager, describing them as “lovely”, “very good” and “very friendly.”

People were safeguarded from abuse. Risks to individuals and the environment were well managed. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and they were recruited in a safe way. The provider learned from previous accidents and incidents to reduce future risks. Arrangements were in place for the safe administration of medicines. The premises were clean and tidy and staff followed infection control procedures.

An assessment of people’s needs was completed before they received support. Staff were supported and equipped to carry out their roles through ongoing training, regular supervisions and annual appraisals. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives, and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff supported people to enjoy a balanced diet and to access a range of health care professionals.

People were well supported and cared for. Staff treated people with dignity and respect and supported them to maintain their independence. People were supported to maintain relationships that were important to them and advocacy support was available, when needed.

People had person-centred care plans that detailed how they wanted to be supported. Staff knew how to communicate with people and most effective communication methods were detailed in care records. People and relatives had no complaints about the home but knew how to raise concerns. Any complaints received were fully investigated and actioned. People enjoyed a range of activities inside the home and accessed the local community.

The home was well managed. People and relatives were complimentary about the home and felt the registered manager was very approachable and open. An effective quality assurance process was in place. People, relatives and staff were regularly consulted about the quality of the care and support through surveys and meetings.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 16 October 2017). Since this rating was

awarded the registered provider of the service has changed. We have used the previous rating to inform our planning and decisions about the rating at this inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the new registration of the service.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.