• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Whell Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

6 Dilston Terrace, Amble, Morpeth, NE65 0DT (01665) 711170

Provided and run by:
Whell Care Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 7 May to 8 June 2026.

Whell Care is a homecare service which provides independent supported living to 1 person living in their own home. They also provide domiciliary homecare which has been assessed separately.

Staff knew people well and supported them in a way that promoted their safety, dignity, independence and wellbeing. Risks were assessed and managed, medicines were administered safely, and staff worked well with relatives and health professionals to help achieve positive outcomes.

Staff had received training to meet the people’s needs, including specialist health needs, and staffing arrangements supported continuity of care. Governance systems, including audits, competency checks and oversight of care records and medicines, helped maintain standards and support improvement. Overall, the service was well-led and committed to providing good quality care.

During an assessment under our new approach

Whell Care is a homecare service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of the assessment there were 18 people receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

This assessment was carried out due to the length of time since the last assessment. The assessment commenced on 22 January 2026 and concluded on 12 March 2026.

At this inspection the provider was in breach of the legal regulation good governance, relating to care records, recruitment and risk assessments.

Governance systems were not always robust and there were missed opportunities to identify issues in record keeping and risk assessments.

People and relatives consistently describing their experiences as highly positive. Staff were praised for being kind, respectful and attentive, and people said they felt safe and well cared for. Health and social care partners said the service collaborated with them well and staff followed clinical guidance appropriately. While systems and practice largely supported good outcomes, some areas of documentation such as risk assessments and care planning, were not always person-centred.

Staff demonstrated strong teamwork and showed a good understanding of people’s needs. People received care in line with their preferences, and the provider promoted independence, choice and wellbeing. However, care documents did not contain enough person-centred‑ detail, meaning written plans did not always capture what mattered most to people. There was no evidence that people experienced harm or poor care, and feedback strongly reflected a positive culture focused on meeting people’s needs.

Staff and people described the registered manager as approachable and supportive. The registered manager was open to feedback and took steps to address issues during the assessment.

5 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Valhallah is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of inspection, 10 people were receiving regulated activity.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

There were issues around the safe recruitment of staff. Some pre-recruitment checks were not made in the four files we considered and, in one case, the service could not be satisfied that a member of staff had been safely employed. After the inspection, additional checks were made to support that the person was safe to work with vulnerable people. We found no evidence people were at risk of harm from this concern. This has resulted in making a recommendation that can be seen in the 'safe' section of this report.

Although we were satisfied people received their medicines as prescribed, some aspects of medicines administration and recording were not always safe. We have made a recommendation about this in the 'safe' section of this report.

People told us they felt safe. Staff understood their responsibilities about keeping people safe. Risks were identified and managed. Incidents and accidents were recorded so that they could be considered and reflected upon to make improvements to the service. Staff understood their responsibilities to prevent the spread of infection whilst working in and between people's homes.

People told us staff were kind and caring. People said staff, including the registered manager, had met their expectations of a care service. People and relatives had a high level of trust in staff which had a positive impact on their wellbeing. Staff supported people to remain independent and promoted their dignity. People's privacy was respected and their personal information was kept confidentially.

Staff had completed training in key areas and were supported to carry out their roles. People and relatives had confidence in staff and were content with the care they received. People were supported to access health services if needed. People's dietary needs were assessed and, where required, they were supported with their meals.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People's care plans were up to date about their individual needs and preferences. People and their relatives knew how to complain, although none we spoke with had any complaints.

The service was managed by a registered manager who had a clear vision about the quality of care they wanted to provide. Staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities. There were quality assurance systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. There was a focus on continuous improvement.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 15/11/2018 and this was the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the date the agency first registered with CQC.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.