All inspections: Valley View Surgery - Care Quality Commission

Date of Assessment: 10 and 23 July 2025

Valley View Surgery is a GP practice which provides primary care services to patients in Bradford, West Yorkshire. The practice is registered with the Care Quality Commission to deliver the regulated activities; diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The practice is situated within the NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board area and delivers Primary Medical Services to a patient population of approximately 6,500. The practice is part of the Bradford City 5 Primary Care Network.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the lowest decile (1 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 59% Asian, 32% White, 3% Black, 3% Mixed, and 3% Other.

We carried out this assessment to follow up on concerns reported to us. At this assessment we reviewed the practice’s performance in the key questions safe, effective, caring, responsive, and well-led. The practice is rated requires improvement overall, and in the key questions caring and well-led. The practice is rated good in the key questions safe, effective and responsive. We have identified a breach of regulation 17 (good governance) and have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

We carried out an announced focused inspection at Valley View Surgery on 31 October 2019.

We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us. This inspection looked at the following key questions effective, responsive and well led.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

what we found when we inspected
information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs. Individual needs were assessed and responded to.
The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
There was compassionate, supportive, inclusive and effective leadership.

We one area of outstanding practice.

The practice considered the holistic needs of their patients and gave continuous support to their patient participation group and their patient champions who could use an appropriate room for meetings and get togethers. This alliance focused on the physical and mental wellbeing of patients in a highly deprived area with a number of initiatives to combat ill health, loneliness and vulnerability. These included weekly ‘knit and natter sessions’, coffee mornings held to raise awareness of relevant health issues such as diabetes and tuberculosis, working in partnership with a women’s refugee society and offering Pilates classes to patients. The practice had also offered English classes and Urdu classes in partnership with a women’s organisation.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

Improve the uptake of childhood immunisations at the practice and ensure that the World Health Organisation minimum target of 90% is met.
Continue to review and improve the uptake of cancer screening at the practice including breast, bowel and cervical screening.
Continue to review and respond to the GP Patient Survey so that they can meet the needs of their patient population.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Valley View Surgery on 08 June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. The lead GP had met with patients to discuss their concerns and improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
Feedback forms for the Friends and Family test were available in several languages relevant to the patient group, including Bengali and Polish. The Friends and Family test is a survey which asks patients if they would recommend NHS services to other people based on the quality of the care they have received.
Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. All staff had undertaken appropriate checks through the Disclosure and Barring Service check (DBS). (DBS checks identify whether a person has a criminal record or is on an official list of people barred from working in roles where they may have contact with children or adults who may be vulnerable).
The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on. Staff told us that they would feel confident to raise any concerns with the GP partners.
Patients said that they did not find it easy to make an appointment or speak to a GP.
The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
We found that out of hours reports were not always reviewed by a clinician and that the practice was slow to manage electronic post. The practice agreed to review these systems.

We saw one area of outstanding practice

In addition to the Patient participation group (PPG), the practice hosted a number of community focussed social groups such as the” Knitter Natter” group. The practice and the partners used these groups to deliver health education messages and improve access to health care for their patients. For example, English lessons delivered at the practice also focussed on teaching people how to book and arrange appointments and what services were available.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

The practice should continue to review the results of patient satisfaction surveys and ensure that it can meet the needs of the patient population in the future and improve access.
The practice should ensure that all out of hours reports are reviewed by a clinician and that electronic post is managed in a timely manner.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)

Chief Inspector of General Practice

Our inspection on the 8 October 2013 found the provider was not carrying out appropriate recruitment checks. Also the practice did not have robust systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of health care associated infections. Following the inspection the provider wrote to us and told us they would take action to ensure they were compliant with these essential standards.

At this inspection we found the provider had reviewed their policies and procedures and implemented new systems which assessed the risk of and prevented the spread of health care associated infections. In addition they had reviewed the recruitment procedure to make sure it informed staff of the actions they must take to ensure only suitable staff were employed at the practice.

We spoke with four people who used the service, they told us they were very 'happy' and would recommend the service. They were able to see a doctor promptly when they needed to and they had 'no concerns or complaints at all'. One said 'I have had a great service, it is excellent here'.

However we found appropriate checks were not always undertaken before staff began work.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

Although we saw and three people told us the practice was always clean, we found the practice did not have robust systems in place which were designed to assess the risk of and prevent, detect and control the spread of health care associated infection.

There was an effective complaints system in place. Complaints people made were responded to appropriately.

Valley View Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

31/10/2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

8 June 2016

During a routine inspection