• Doctor
  • GP practice

Norton Canes Health Centre Also known as Dr W Nilar and Partner

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Brownhills Road, Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffordshire, WS11 9SE (01543) 450222

Provided and run by:
Norton Canes Health Centre

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 29 June 2026. Norton Canes Health Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 3,835 people under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 96.4% White, 1.0% Asian, 1.7% Mixed, 0.6% Black and 0.3% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 6th decile (6 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. However, recruitment procedures required improvement to ensure all required information was obtained.

Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes. The practice had exceeded national targets across all 5 childhood immunisation indicators and were working towards improving cancer screening uptake rates.

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity. Action had been taken to improve privacy at the reception desk in addition to providing a patient self-check in facility.

People could access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Same day and routine appointments were readily available. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.

The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

10/06/2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at Norton Canes Health Centre on 10 June 2019. We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us. This inspection looked at the following key questions: safe, effective and well-led. We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • What we found when we inspected
  • Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • Information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We previously carried out a comprehensive inspection at Norton Canes Health Centre on 9 April 2015. The overall rating was Good. The report on the April 2015 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Norton Canes Health Centre on our website at .

We have rated this practice as Good overall and good for all population groups. We found that:

  • Patients received safe, effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff were supported in their roles and with their professional development.
  • The way the practice was managed promoted the delivery of person-centred care.
  • The practice understood the needs of its population and tailored services in response to those needs.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Clinical audits demonstrated quality improvement.
  • Staff felt supported by the management team, proud to work at the practice and comfortable to raise concerns.
  • The practice had very recently developed a patient participation group to proactively seek feedback from patients about the services provided.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of person-centred care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Consider obtaining a hearing loop.
  • Continue to develop and increase the membership of the patient participation group.
  • Consider developing a practice website.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

09/04/2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Norton Canes Health Centre on 9 April 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. It was also good for providing services for older people, people with long-term conditions, families, children and young people, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including those with dementia).

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. This was evidenced in higher than average patient survey feedback and in the feedback we received about the practice.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.

  • Review and improve the availability of emergency medicines to ensure that the practice is able to respond appropriately to the range of medical emergencies likely to be experienced in general practice.
  • Provide more detailed information to patients on appropriate ways to access out-of-hours services when the practice is closed.
  • Consider the development of a formal practice vision and values.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice