• Doctor
  • GP practice

Marden Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Marden, 25 Sutton Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 6DL (01743) 241313

Provided and run by:
Marden Medical Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 4 September 2025 to 23 September 2025. Marden Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers service to 11,080 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that the patient ethnicity is 95.86% are white, 1.76% are Asian, 0.32% are black, 1.62% are mixed and 0.43 other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 8 decile (8 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

SAFE: The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment were clean and well-maintained, and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Staff were supported with learning and development opportunities and had regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

EFFECTIVE: People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. When making best interest decisions staff involved those important to people but did not always ensure an assessment of mental capacity was undertaken.

CARING: People were treated with kindness and compassion and were involved in their care and treatment. The National GP Patient Survey results showed 81% of respondents stated that during their last appointment, the healthcare professional was good at treating them with care and concern. In addition, 72% of respondents found the reception and administrative team at this GP practice helpful. Staff shared examples of how they promoted privacy and dignity in their work. Where we saw patient privacy was compromised, action was promptly taken to improve patient experience. Leaders supported staff wellbeing.

RESPONSIVE: People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

WELL-LED: Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

23 October 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at Marden Medical Practice on 23 October 2019 due to the length of time since the last inspection. Following our review of the information available to us, including information provided by the practice, we focused our inspection on the following key questions: Effective and Well-Led. Because of the assurance received from our review of information we carried forward the ratings for the following key questions: Safe, Caring and Responsive.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • What we found when we inspected
  • Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • Information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We previously carried out a comprehensive inspection at Marden Medical Practice on 24 October 2014. The overall rating was Oustanding. We rated the service as outstanding for providing safe and well-led services and good for providing effective, caring and responsive services. The report on the October 2014 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Marden Medical Practice on our website at .

We have rated this practice as outstanding overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs and was planned and delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • The practice understood the needs of its population and tailored services in response to those needs. Recruitment of appropriately skilled and experienced staff to meet patient demand were a practice priority.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care, support and treatment and worked together and with other organisations to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Audits demonstrated quality improvement.
  • Patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and any decisions about their treatment.
  • Staff felt privileged to work at the practice and were valued and well supported by the GPs and the management team.
  • There was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership. Leaders were visible and approachable and understood the strengths and challenges of the services provided.

We have rated the practice as outstanding for well-led because:

  • Leadership was reflective, strong and decisive with emphasis on communication, training and education.
  • There were effective systems in place for continuous improvement and innovation.
  • Leaders were committed to embrace new initiative approaches to patient care.
  • The practice had a clear vision with quality and safety as its top priority and carried out proactive succession planning.
  • Patients were highly satisfied with the with the service they received from the practice. Staff felt valued and supported in their work. There was an effective relationship between the practice and its very active patient participation group who had representation on various groups.
  • There was a strong commitment towards ensuring that there was equality and inclusion promoted across the workforce.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Formalise and document the discussions held and review of consultations for the advanced nurse practitioner.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

24 october 2014

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We inspected this service on 24 October 2014 as part of our new comprehensive inspection programme. This provider had not been inspected before.

The overall rating for this service is outstanding. We found the practice to be good in the responsive, caring and effective domains. We found that the practice was outstanding in the safe and well led domains. We found the practice provided outstanding care to older people, people with long term conditions, people in vulnerable circumstances, families, children and young people, working age people and people experiencing poor mental health.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Patients were kept safe because there were arrangements in place for staff to report and learn from key safety risks. The practice had a system in place for reporting, recording and monitoring significant events over time.
  • The practice was using innovative approaches to patient care including tele-health.
  • Patients were extremely satisfied with the service they received from the practice and there was a well regarded patient participation group.
  • Staff were all clear about their own roles and responsibilities, and felt valued and well supported.
  • There was strong leadership of the practice with great emphasis on communication and training and education.
  • There was a strong relationship between the practice and its very active patient participation group.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice employed a community and care co-ordinator to help patients by co-ordinating support and signposting or referring to other services.
  • The practice used tele-dermatology to send pictures of patients’ skin conditions to hospital based specialists to speed up and improve diagnosis and treatment.
  • There was a comprehensive programme of education and training for all staff using expert external speakers.
  • The practice had a formal buddying system in place to ensure that patients experienced good continuity of care between part time doctors.
  • The practice used Myers Briggs personality testing when recruiting new doctors to the practice.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice