The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Redgate Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Westonzoyland Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 5BF (01278) 454560

Provided and run by:
Redgate Medical Services

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 9 July 2025 to 29 July 2025. Redgate Medical Centre is a GP practice that delivers service to approximately 7,400 people under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that 95.4% of people registered at this service are White, 2.2% are Asian, 1.2% are mixed, 0.5% are Black and 0.7% are of other ethnicities. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 4th decile (4 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report. We assessed all quality statements across safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led key questions.

At this assessment, we found the service understood its patient population and was passionate about providing safe and effective care. The service reviewed and responded to feedback and continued to improve systems and processes. However, our remote clinical searches found gaps in the monitoring and review of medicines. We also identified some issues during our site visit. The service responded promptly and implemented additional systems and processes to reduce risks to people.

19 January 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Redgate Medical Centre on 19 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. Staff told us they were updated at the beginning of each shift with practice concerns or risks.

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Routine patient appointments were for fifteen minutes.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour. (Duty of Candour is a legal duty to ensure providers are open and transparent with people who use services. It also sets out specific requirements providers must follow when things go wrong with care and treatment, including informing patients about the incident, providing reasonable support, providing truthful information and an apology when things go wrong).

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice understood the patient population and used proactive approaches to improve patient wellbeing and physical health. For example, the provision of a weight management group, a weekly walking group, primary medical services at the local college and a support and advice drop in clinic for male students at the local college.

  • The practice provided a support service for vulnerable patients and carers which included a number of initiatives. For example, the practice hosted Age UK fortnightly drop in clinics and a local carer’s support group; the practice worked with a carer’s voluntary organisation that contacted and supported all carers on the practice list.

  • The practice provided staff with additional training and skills. For example, to manage insulin initiation which provided good continuity of care and reduced the need for involvement of the secondary care team. In addition diabetic patients received a mobile phone number where a practice nurse was available for support 24 hours a day.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice