• Doctor
  • GP practice

St Mary's Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Johnson Street, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 1LT (023) 8033 3778

Provided and run by:
St Mary's Surgery

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 29 September 2016

We inspected the practice in April 2015 and found improvements were needed in the area of safety. The provider sent us an action plan which detailed the steps they would take to meet the breaches in regulation. During our latest desktop review on 21 September 2016 we found the provider had made the required improvements.

St Mary’s Surgery is located at 1 Johnson Street, Southampton. SO14 1LT, which is close to the centre of Southampton. The location has 13 consulting room and three treatment rooms. The location provides care and treatment to approximately 23,000 patients across three sites, of which 19,000 are registered at St Mary’s Surgery.

The 19,000 patients that are registered at St Mary’s Surgery can also be seen at Telephone House branch surgery. The practice is open from 8.30am to 6.30pm Monday to Friday. Additional extended hours are offered at St Mary’s Surgery between 7.30am and 8am on Thursdays and at Telephone House Surgery on Monday and Thursday evenings until 8pm and Saturday mornings between 8.30am and 11am. These are for pre-booked appointments only. Telephone lines are open at St Mary’s Surgery on weekdays from 8am.

The area has a large student population and a higher than average number of patients between the ages of 18 and 35 years. Over one quarter of patients do not speak English as their first language.

The practice employs a total of 69 staff, many of whom work across all three locations. Staff include five GP partners, eight salaried GPs, ten nurses and five healthcare assistants. Three GPs are male and ten GPs are female. The practice has a Personal Medical Services (PMS) contract and is also a training practice.

The provider operates from St Mary’s Surgery and at Bargate Medical Centre 1 Spa Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2EG. The provider also operates clinics from Telephone House Surgery, 70-75 High Street, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2NW as a branch location. Patients who are registered at St Mary’s Surgery can also access appointments at Telephone House Surgery.

The practice has opted out of providing out-of-hours services to their own patients. Patients can obtain out of hours care using the 111 service and care is provided by Hampshire Doctors on call.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 29 September 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out a desktop review of St Mary’s Surgery on 21 September 2016. This review was performed to check on the progress of actions taken following an inspection we made in April 2015. Following that inspection the provider sent us an action plan which detailed the steps they would take to meet their breach of regulation. During our latest desktop review on 21 September 2016 we found the provider had made the necessary improvements.

This report covers our findings in relation to the requirements and should be read in conjunction with the report published in August 2016. This can be done by selecting the 'all reports' link for the St Mary’s Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Our key findings at this inspection were as follows:

The practice had improved the systems ensuring that risk assessments and mandatory training was managed effectively so that patient safety is promoted and any risks that could affect the quality of care are reduced. This included:

  • Fire safety had been strengthened so that patients had safe exits in the event of a fire.

  • The chaperone policy and associated procedures had been reviewed to ensure that appropriate vetting and training took place of any staff undertaking these duties, promoting patient safety.

  • Implementation of a system of risk assessment for any new staff to determine whether a Disclosure and Barring Service check was required according to their role and responsibilities.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions. All patients with long term conditions had an annual review and medication check. A specific template had been created to record care and identify risks to patients with long-term conditions such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nurse led specialist clinics were held for patients with diabetes, asthma and COPD. Home visits were available for patients that could not access the surgery.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people. Systems were in place to identify and follow up on those children and young people, who were at risk, including systems to identify and manage risks to the unborn child. An extended appointment service was available to provide appointments for school age children. The practice provided appointments on the same day for children and a children’s phlebotomy (blood taking) service was available on site. There was a health visitor clinic held at the site and the health visitor offered drop in clinics and first time parent classes.

Older people

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people. The practice offered proactive personalised care to meet the needs of older people in its population and had a range of enhanced services available. All patients over the age of 75 had a named GP. The practice provided a 60 minute health check for all patients over the age of 75 and had created a screening tool to record information as part of the health check. Older patients with complex needs had a care plan in place.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of working age people (including those recently retired and students). The practice provided care to a large student population. A total of 69% of the practice population were under the age of 35. The practice provided an extended hours service with GPs and nurses and telephone consultations were available. Repeat prescriptions and appointments could be requested on-line. Same day appointments were available every day and this helped people to get medical care quickly so that they could return to work. The practice had run a successful cervical screening campaign and this was supported by additional nurse clinics. This had increased the number of women who received cervical screening to 89.97% compared to the national average of 81.89%.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health. People who were experiencing poor mental health were supported by look after their physical health. A total of 93.8% of patients with poor mental health had their alcohol consumption discussed with them in the last year. A template had been instigated to assist in the assessment and documentation of care provided to people with poor mental health and their ability to make decision. A register of people experiencing poor mental health was available. All patients who did not attend for appointments were contacted by telephone.

The practice provided funding for fifteen hours of one to one counselling each week, which was made available to those patients who would not otherwise be eligible for a counselling service through any other route. Patients were encouraged and supported to access other services such as substance misuse services. A GP acted as lead for supporting patients who misused substances. This involved providing shared care controlled prescribing, with patients being reviewed every six months by the GP and a substance misuse counsellor.

A dementia screening tool had been created and was being used to assess patients who were at risk of dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 3 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. The practice had created a safeguarding referral template and their safeguarding procedures had been implemented across the clinical commissioning group. Clinical alerts were placed on the system to identify patients whose circumstances made them vulnerable and staff had attended a practice based domestic violence and abuse training support and referral programme and completed training in communication.

Patients who had complex care needs were placed on a practice register and an admission avoidance scheme was in place. This had been put in place in response to a high number of hospital admission reported in 2013 to 2014. The number of emergency cancer admissions per 100 patients on disease register was 38.1 compared to the national average of 7.4. GPs told us that this had been reduced and patients receiving palliative care were placed on an end of life register and had two named GPs. Multi-disciplinary meetings were held with the district nursing team. The practice had increased the number of additional locum sessions from four sessions to seven sessions during the winter months and put in place a system where patients could be seen on the same day or early the next day to reduce the number of patients using out of hours services.

Over 25% of the practice population did not speak English as a first language. Staff had worked with a local voluntary organisation, which provided a radio station, catering to the Asian and ethnic minority communities in the area, to provide information to the local population about how to access the practice, influenza management and childhood immunisations. The practice had provided support to access healthcare to women in the local Afghan community. A GP told us that he met with a local Somali leader to provide information and discuss access to healthcare for the local Somali population. The practice had an automated check-in service, which could be operated in ten different languages. Translators and sign language support service were available.