• Doctor
  • GP practice

New Cross Health Centre

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Suite 3 Waldron Health Centre, Amersham Vale, London, SE14 6LD (020) 3049 2370

Provided and run by:
Hurley Clinic Partnership

All Inspections

6 December 2024

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at New Cross Health Centre on 6 December 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Safe - good

Effective – requires improvement

Caring – requires improvement

Responsive - requires improvement

Well-led – requires improvement

Following our previous inspection on 13 December 2016 the practice was rated good overall and for providing safe, effective, responsive, and well-led services. The practice was rated requires improvement for providing caring services.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for New Cross Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • Cervical screening and child immunisations uptake were below the national target. However, there were robust recall systems and performance against these targets was continually reviewed and monitored.
  • The practice performance for the patient experience indicators in the national GP survey was below the local and national average since 2019 and this had further declined in 2023 (except in one out of four indicators).
  • Patients’ needs were assessed, and care and treatment were mostly delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance. Still, there was room for improvement.
  • The provider had a programme of clinical and non-clinical audits to improve patient care. That said, it was unclear how the information was shared with clinical staff.
  • The practice's performance for the access indicators in the national GP survey was below the local and national average. However, the practice's patient survey results showed improved patient experience.
  • Staff had received appropriate training and there were effective health and safety risk assessments.
  • Staff spoke positively about leaders and felt supported.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Although the practice leaders showed us evidence of improvement plans following the concerns raised, ratings are based on evidence at the time of inspection.

We found a breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue with efforts to improve uptake for cervical cancer screening and child immunisations.
  • Take action to inform relevant staff of the clinical audits that have been carried out at the practice.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

13 December 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at New Cross GP Walk-in Centre on 13 December 2016. This centre provides care for both registered and unregistered (walk-in) patients. Overall the service is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • The service had a system in place for walk-in patients where reception staff would get walk-in patients to complete a short registration form, they would enter details onto a patient management system and identify priority patients with potential life threatening conditions or other conditions that required an urgent response; if any of these conditions were presented, the patient management system sent automatic notifications to clinicians and the reception team called for further assistance.
  • Patients on the day said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The service had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The service proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified to ensure information, advice and support can be made available to them.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice