• Doctor
  • GP practice

St John's Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

56-60 Loampit Hill, London, SE13 7SX (020) 8692 1354

Provided and run by:
The Lewisham Care Partnership

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 28 October and 6 November 2025. St John's Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers a service to approximately 53,000 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The provider has five sites with one site used as the CQC registered location. The National General Practice Profiles states that the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 8% Asian, 58% White, 22% Black, 8% Mixed, and 4% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the fourth decile (4 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

The service had undertaken work to ensure that they responded to people’s needs, and that they had choice and control relating to care options. They had also changed the appointments process and had recruited more clinical staff to improve equity in access and person-centred care. These changes were implemented after the last NHS National GP Patient Survey had taken place, so it was not clear at the time of the assessment whether or not patients felt that these changes provided them with a good level of service.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities.

We found breaches of regulation in relation to good governance, regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 20 January 2025 to 21 January 2025. St John's Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers a service to approximately 53,000 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The provider has five sites with one site used as the CQC registered location. The National General Practice Profiles states that the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 8% Asian, 58% White, 22% Black, 8% Mixed, and 4% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the fourth decile (4 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

21 September 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at St John's Medical Centre on 21 September 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed patient outcomes were comparable to local and national average for most indicators. The practice was aware of the areas for development and had plans in place to achieve this.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Consider reviewing complaints periodically to identify trends and facilitate learning. .
  • Review the procedure for maintaining staff files to ensure that they are complete.
  • Continue to improve care for patients with long term conditions, particularly patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, and to reduce rates of patients excepted from Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators.
  • Consider ways to reduce waiting times for patients.
  • Consider developing a wider programme of audit, to improve services and outcomes for patients.
  • Review the new system for checking urgent referrals, to check that it is working as anticipated.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice