• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Calverton Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2a St Wilfrid's Square, Calverton, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG14 6FP (0115) 965 7801

Provided and run by:
The Calverton Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 4 February 2025 to 28 February 2025.

The Calverton Practice is a GP practice and delivers service to approximately 10,500 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that the ethnic make-up of the practice population is 96.7% white, 0.6% Asian, 0.5% Black, 1.8% mixed and 0.4% other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 8th decile (8 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Some appraisals were overdue but had been scheduled. On the whole, staff managed medicines well. Some patients were overdue monitoring or a medicines review, but the practice acted to rectify this during the course of our assessment.

People were involved in assessments of their needs and care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity and treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were given choices about their care, were involved in planning it and could access services in a timely way. The service provided information people could understand. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to develop.

7 January 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Calverton Practice on 7 January 2015. Overall the practice is rated as outstanding.

Specifically, we found the practice to be outstanding for providing effective and responsive services. It was also outstanding for providing services for people with long-term conditions and working age people (including those recently retired and students).

It was good for providing safe, caring and well-led services. It was also good for providing services for older people, people with long-term conditions, families, children and young people, people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice;

  • The practice ran a tier 4 anticoagulant service overseen by the practice pharmacist which included providing services to all housebound patients by appropriately trained Heath Care assistants. This service was not routinely available in other practices within the CCG area.
  • The practice employed a practice pharmacist who was also trained as an independent prescriber. The pharmacist offered clinics which were tailored to meet the needs of patients with complex conditions. This service was available to all registered patients. The practice was able to demonstrate very effective prescribing rates in terms of hypnotic usage, anti-inflammatory medication and antibiotic prescribing compared to the national average as a result of continuous quality improvement.
  • The practice ran a morning walk in service for minor illness led by appropriately trained practice nurses. The practice was able to demonstrate lower accident and emergency (A&E) attendance rates than the average for the locality.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice