The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Nightingale House Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1-3 Nightingale Road, Edmonton, London, N9 8AJ (020) 8805 9997

Provided and run by:
Nightingale House Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Nightingale House Surgery is a GP practice that delivers services to approximately 6,100 patients under a contract held with NHS England. National GP profiles state the ethnic makeup of the practice area is 39.39% White, 12.78% Asian, 27.64% Black, 5.12% Mixed and 15.06% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that the deprivation within the practice population is in the 3rd decile of 10. The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working in and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statement section of this report.

People and staff were kept safe and protected, with incidents and complaints investigated. However, we found that the recording of significant events was low in number. Learning outcomes were discussed. There was a robust Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) system with regular audits. Staff received regular training and appraisals. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning and changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Regular health checks and reviews tool place. Evidence based care in line with good practice was delivered. The service worked with other agencies to enable good outcomes of care. People made informed decisions about their health.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Dignity and privacy were respected. A chaperone service was provided to those who requested it.

People were involved in decisions about their care and information needed to make a decision was provided. Interpretation services were available. Complaints were handled appropriately.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture. Leaders understood equality, human rights and safe compassionate care. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities.

The provider was previously inspected in 2017 under our old methodology and was rated good. At this inspection we found that the practice was rated as good.

 

13 July 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Nightingale House Surgery on 13 July 2016. Overall the practice is rated as Good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is available to them.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

5 June 2014

During a routine inspection

Nightingale House Surgery is a general practice (GP) surgery that operates from a single premises located in Edmonton, within the Enfield Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) area. Enfield CCG is a membership organisation of 54 local GP practices and is responsible for commissioning health services for a population of around 310,000 people. Census data showed that 38.8% of the population belong to non-white minorities which is more than three times higher than the England average (12.3%). Other White (18.2%), Black African (9.0%) and Black Caribbean (5.0%) are the biggest minority groups in the Enfield area. The service is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide the regulated activities of diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning, maternity and midwifery services, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder and / or injury. The practice currently has just under 6000 patients on its list.

We carried out an announced inspection on 05 June 2014. The inspection took place over one day and was led by a lead inspector and a GP. A practice manager and an expert by experience were also part of the inspection team.

All the patients we talked with were very happy with the care they received. We received 28 comment cards and almost all had very positive comments about the care and service provided by the surgery. We spoke with all the staff members available on the day of our visit. These included three GPs, the practice manager, three clinical nurses and five members of the reception and administration team.   

The GP partners provided a visible leadership, and staff we spoke with told us they were very supportive of them. There was a strong focus on caring for patients and the provision of a patient-centred care.

Though we identified some areas for improvement, overall we found that the practice provided an effective and caring service which was safe, well-led and responsive to people’s needs. The various population groups including older people, people with long term conditions, mothers, babies, children and young people, the working age populations and those recently retired, people in vulnerable circumstances and people experiencing poor mental health received a care that was effective and caring and mostly safe, responsive and well-led.