Clapham Park Group Practice

On this page

• Overview
• Learning culture
• Safe systems, pathways and transitions
• Safeguarding
• Involving people to manage risks
• Safe environments
• Safe and effective staffing
• Infection prevention and control
• Medicines optimisation

We looked for evidence that staff protected people from avoidable harm and made sure care was delivered from environments that were clean and well maintained. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Learning culture during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Safe systems, pathways and transitions during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Safeguarding during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Involving people to manage risks during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

The service detected and controlled potential risks in the care environment. They made sure equipment, facilities and technology supported the delivery of safe care.
The service had contracts to ensure the premises was maintained. This included carrying out regular risk assessments of fire, health and safety and legionella and completing electrical checks in line with legal requirements. Where actions were identified in the assessments, they had completed them. The service had a business continuity plan which was regularly reviewed and outlined how the service should continue to operate in the event of a disruption.
 

The service made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. They worked together well to provide safe care that met people’s individual needs.
The service employed a range of clinical and non-clinical roles, which included GPs, nurses, paramedics and pharmacists. Leaders ensured staff were up to date with their training which the service had deemed mandatory and operated within their agreed areas of competence. The business manager had a system in place to record training that was completed, or due to be completed. They demonstrated they had appropriate oversight of the training needs of staff.
We reviewed 4 training records and saw that staff had completed training in line with requirements. This included safeguarding, infection control and basic life support.
The service followed safe recruitment procedures when employing staff, which were in line with national legislation. This included identity checks, review of qualifications, obtaining of professional references and a criminal records check.
 

The service assessed and managed the risk of infection. They detected and controlled the risk of it spreading and shared concerns with appropriate agencies promptly.
The service had cleaning schedules available, which outlined how staff should clean the building and its equipment. The service demonstrated how these were monitored for completion to maintain oversight of cleaning arrangements. During our onsite visit, the service's premises and a sample of equipment reviewed was noted to be visibly clean. The service’s infection prevention and control lead conducted regular risk assessments and audits to ensure compliance and took action where necessary to mitigate any identified risks. We reviewed an external infection control audit completed by the local NHSE team in May 2025 and noted all actions had been followed up. We saw completed cleaning schedules.
Staff had completed relevant training in infection prevention and control, the infection control lead did group training, sent out emails, and completed annual infection control audits.
 

We did not look at Medicines optimisation during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.