• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

All For You Home Care Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Bridge House, 22 Bromsgrove Road, Redditch, B97 4QY (01527) 758448

Provided and run by:
All For You Home Care Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment 9 April 2026.

This was a risk-based assessment due to the concerns received in relation to staffing and times of calls. Our inspection was prompted as we acknowledged that the previous inspection took place 7 years ago.

All For You Home Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection 17 people were receiving personal care from the service.

We assessed the service against “Right care, right support, right culture” guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found people received care in accordance with this guidance and care workers and staff had received appropriate training relating to people with a learning disability and autistic people. The provider was working in line with these principles.

People’s needs were assessed before they began using the service. Staff worked effectively with external professionals to maintain continuity of care and received training about how to support people’s needs. Risks were assessed, and staff had access to guidance to support safe care. People received the support they needed with medicines, which were reviewed regularly. Some relatives expressed concerns regarding timing of the visits and turnover of staff. Some people/relatives reported not all staff used PPE.

Consent to provide care was obtained by staff. Where appropriate, people were supported to access GP and primary care services. Staff monitored and documented outcomes for people, looking at where things had worked well, and where improvements were needed. People told us they were supported by kind and caring staff who treated them with respect and compassion.

Staff had a robust understanding of people’s likes and dislikes. The service used creative ways to support communication with people. There were appropriate systems in place to gather feedback from people/relatives. However, some relatives told us they were not always provided with feedback regarding their concerns reported to the office.

There was a positive culture within the service, and staff were supported to provide consistent and person-centred care. The management team were competent, visible and led by example. They were knowledgeable about issues and priorities for improving the quality of service. The provider and senior leadership had developed systems to maintain oversight of the service and used lessons learned to drive ongoing improvement.

3 May 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: All For You Home Care is registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes, including older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection visit, the service supported two people.

People’s experience of using this service:

Calls were made by consistent staff, at the times arranged and those staff stayed for the right amount of time to provide the support they required.

Staff knew people well, especially their individual routines and preferences.

Staff were knowledgeable about the risks associated with people's care and people’s individual risk management plans provided staff with the information needed to manage those risks safely.

Recruitment processes were thorough to ensure staff were recruited safely. There were enough staff to provide the care and support people needed.

Both people receiving support were able to self-medicate so were not supported by staff, however staff were trained to administer medicines and regular checks and processes were in place to ensure when needed, they would be given safely.

People and their relatives made decisions about their care and were supported by staff who understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Where family members had authority to act on their behalf, records supported this. Staff understood the importance of seeking consent to support and staff provide people with choice where possible, and respected people’s decisions.

Staff were caring and respected their right to privacy and dignified care. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and continually involved people to make sure they felt comfortable, or if they wanted to do things for themselves.

Care plans were personalised and provided staff with the information needed for each care call. Records showed additional information and guidance was provided, such as how to use certain equipment or to inform staff about different health conditions. Where needs changed, staff said communication was effective, so they knew what was required to provide effective and safe care.

Staff knew how to keep people protected from poor practice or abuse. The registered manager was confident as they increased their number of care packages, this could be maintained.

The provider’s governance systems were operated and managed effectively to ensure people received good outcomes that continued to meet their needs. The quality assurance systems were reviewed and robust enough to ensure good outcomes continued to be provided as the service grew.

The provider utilised electronic call monitoring and call scheduling to ensure care calls were completed on time. They were confident as care calls increased, this system would provide tight controls over care calls to ensure they continued to be when people required them. Records showed care calls were made when people wanted them.

The registered manager adopted effective security measures so people’s personal and important information remained as secure and confidential as possible.

Although this was the first inspection since their registration with us and they only supported two people, we found the service met the characteristics of a “Good” rating in five areas.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: This is the first rating inspection since the provider registered with us on 26 April 2018.

Why we inspected: This was a planned and announced inspection based on date the provider registered with us. We aim to inspect newly registered services within 12 months of registration.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.