Updated 30 May 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type:
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides a service to younger adults and older people.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small, and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.
What we did:
Prior to the inspection we reviewed any notifications we had received from the service. A notification is information about important events which the service is required to tell us about by law.
We looked at the Provider Information Return (PIR). Providers are required to send us this key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.
Inspection site visit activity started on 15 March 2019 and ended on 12 April 2019. During this time, we spent two days at the location office and contacted people using the service and staff to hear their views. We looked at records relating to three people’s care, incident reports, policies and procedures, recruitment procedures, and training records. We also looked at audits and systems in place to check on the quality of the service provided.
We spoke with the registered manager and the nominated individual (which we referred to as the provider), and three support workers. We also spoke with one person using the service and four people’s relatives.