• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Furlong House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Lanton Close, Bloxwich, Walsall, West Midlands, WS3 2LJ (01922) 491498

Provided and run by:
GreenSquareAccord Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 26 April 2019

The inspection: We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team: An inspector carried out this inspection.

Service and service type: This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. People using the service lived in their own flats which were located in the same building. The service is registered to provide a service to older people and younger adults with physical disabilities, learning disabilities and autism, and people with mental health conditions. At the time of our inspection it was only supporting older people and people with physical disabilities.

Not everyone using Furlong House receives a regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. For people the provider helps with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating, we also consider any wider social care provided.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection: We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small, supports people in their own homes and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

What we did: Before inspection: We reviewed information we held about the service, including the notifications we had received from the provider. Notifications are changes, events or incidents the provider is legally obliged to send us within required timescales.

We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. Providers are required to send us key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.

We contacted commissioners of the relevant local authorities and the local authority safeguarding team to gain their views of the care provided by Furlong House.

During inspection: We visited four people at home with their permission. We looked at three care plans, three medicine administration records (MARs) and handover sheets. We spoke with six members of staff, including the registered manager, deputy manager and support workers. We looked at two staff files, which included recruitment records. We also looked at records involved with the day to day running of the service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 26 April 2019

About the service: Furlong House is a domiciliary care agency that was providing personal care to 25 older people and people with physical disabilities at the time of our inspection.

People’s experience of using this service: People said staff were caring and kind. Staff treated people with dignity and respect, and protected and promoted their independence.

Risks to people were assessed and reduced. Medicines were managed safely. People were supported by stable staffing teams who had been safely recruited.

Staff were supported with regular training, supervision and appraisal. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff worked effectively with external professionals to promote people’s health and wellbeing.

People received personalised support and were involved in planning and reviewing this. Systems were in place to help people communicate their wishes and views. The provider had effective complaints processes in place.

The registered manager was a visible presence at the service, and we received positive feedback on their leadership. A range of quality assurance checks were carried out to monitor and improve standards. The service had successful partnerships in place with other professionals and organisations that benefited people receiving support.

Rating at last inspection: This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered in November 2017.

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection under our inspection programme.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.