You are here

The provider of this service changed - see old profile

Inspection Summary

Overall summary & rating


Updated 11 July 2018

This inspection took place on 13 and 14 June 2018 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection since a new provider, Greensleeves Homes Trust, took over the running of Glebelands House on 27 June 2017. The home was previously run by a different provider and was rated as good under their registration. There has been little change to the staff and services offered since the new provider took over.

Glebelands House is a care home with nursing. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Glebelands House provides a service to up to 42 people, some of whom may be living with dementia, a physical disability and/or a sensory impairment. The accommodation is arranged over three floors, with lift access to each floor. At the time of our inspection there were 41 people living at the service.

There was a registered manager as required. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager and deputy manager were present and assisted us on both days of this inspection.

People felt safe living at the service and were protected from risks relating to their care and welfare. Staff knew how to recognise the signs of abuse and were aware of actions to take if they felt people were at risk.

Premises risk assessments and health and safety audits were carried out and issues identified were dealt with quickly. Furniture and fixtures were of good quality and well maintained.

People were protected because safe recruitment practices were followed before new staff were employed to work with people. Required checks were made to ensure staff were of good character and suitable for their role.

People received care and support from staff who knew them well. Staff training was up to date and staff felt they received the training they needed to carry out their work safely and effectively. People received support that was individualised to their personal preferences and needs. Their needs were monitored and care plans were reviewed monthly or as changes occurred.

People received effective health care and support. Medicines were stored and handled correctly and safely. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Meals were nutritious and varied. People told us they enjoyed the meals at the service and confirmed they were given choices.

People were treated with care and kindness. People's wellbeing was protected and all interactions observed between staff and people living at the service were respectful and friendly. People confirmed staff respected their privacy and dignity.

People were aware of how to make a complaint. They told us they could approach management and staff with any concerns and felt they would listen and take action. They benefitted from living at a service that had an open and friendly culture and from a staff team that were happy in their work.

People living at the service felt there was a good atmosphere and thought the service was managed well. Staff also felt the service was well-managed. They told us the management were open with them and communicated what was happening at the service and with the people living there.

Inspection areas



Updated 11 July 2018

The service was safe. Staff had a good understanding of how to keep people safe and their responsibilities for reporting accidents, incidents or concerns.

Risks to staff and people�s safety had been assessed and plans were in place to minimise those risks. Recruitment processes were in place to make sure, as far as possible, that people were protected from staff being employed who were not suitable.

There were sufficient numbers of staff and medicines were stored and handled correctly.



Updated 11 July 2018

The service was effective. People benefitted from a staff team that was well trained and supervised. Staff had the skills and support needed to deliver care to a good standard.

Staff promoted people's rights to consent to their care. Staff were aware of their responsibilities to ensure people's rights to make their own decisions were promoted. The registered manager was aware of the requirements under the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and had made applications when applicable.

People were supported to eat and drink enough and staff took action to ensure their health and social care needs were met. The premises were bright and homely. The environment was designed and laid out to enable people to mobilise around the service independently where possible.



Updated 11 July 2018

The service was caring. People benefitted from a staff team that was caring and respectful.

People received individualised care from staff who were compassionate and understanding of their known wishes and preferences.

People's right to confidentiality was protected. People's dignity and privacy were respected and staff encouraged people to live as full a life as possible, maintaining their independence where they could.



Updated 11 July 2018

The service was responsive. People received care and support that was personalised to meet their individual needs. The service provided was reviewed and adapted in response to people's changing needs.

The staff helped people maintain relationships with those important to them. People were able to enjoy a number of activities, based on their known likes and preferences.

People knew how to raise concerns. Complaints were dealt with quickly and resolutions were recorded along with actions taken.



Updated 11 July 2018

The service was well led. People were relaxed and happy and there was an open and inclusive atmosphere at the service.

Staff were happy working at the service and we saw there was a good team spirit. They felt supported by the management and felt the training and support they received helped them to do their job well.

Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the quality of service being delivered and the running of the service.