• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Bluebird Care (Sevenoaks)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

87 St. Johns Hill, Sevenoaks, TN13 3PE (01732) 471543

Provided and run by:
BenJeMax Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 5 December 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was carried out by one inspector, an assistant inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. The assistant inspector made telephone calls to staff and the Expert by Experience made calls to people and relatives.

Service and service type

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

Inspection activity started on 09 September 2019 when we made telephone calls to people and their relatives and ended on 29 October 2019. We visited the office location on 29 October 2019.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.

We reviewed the information we held about the service including previous inspection reports. We also looked at notifications about important events that had taken place in the service, which the provider is required to tell us by law.

We contacted health and social care professionals to obtain feedback about their experience of the service. These professionals included local authority commissioners and Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. Healthwatch told us they had not been to the service since we last inspected and had not received any information about the service. We received feedback from a local authority social worker. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with four people who used the service and six relatives about their experience of the care provided.

We spoke with 12 staff including; care workers, live in care workers coordinators, the deputy manager, the registered manager and the nominated individual for the provider. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.

We reviewed a range of records. This included five people’s care records and multiple medicines records. We looked at three staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the registered manager to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality monitoring documents.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 5 December 2019

About the service

Bluebird Care (Sevenoaks) is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. The service was providing personal care to approximately 56 people at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Staff had been recruited safely to ensure they were suitable to work with people. People told us they had regular staff who they knew well. Their regular staff arrived at the right time to meet their needs.

People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm and risks to people were managed. The management team promoted an open culture to encourage staff to raise any concerns. People’s medicines were well managed.

People's needs were assessed, monitored and reviewed to ensure their needs were met. People were supported by competent, knowledgeable and well-trained staff. Staff were supported by the management team.

The service was well-led. The management team carried out the appropriate checks to ensure that the quality of the service was continuously reviewed, improved and evolved to meet people’s changing needs. The provider promoted an open culture and was a visible presence in the service, staff felt supported by the management team, they felt listened to and valued.

Where required, people were supported to ensure their dietary needs and preferences were met. Staff worked closely with occupational therapists and other agencies to assess people’s needs and ensure people were supported with their changing needs.

People and their relatives told us their choices and decisions were listened to and they were in control of their support. On a day to day basis people directed their care. People and their relatives told us they were asked how they liked things to be done. People said staff treated them with dignity and their privacy was respected. People were supported to be as independent as possible.

People gave us positive feedback about their care and support. They told us, “The carers have been coming for around two to three years. They're really nice people I can’t fault them” and “Everything is well managed.”

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The service was rated Good at the last inspection on 04 October 2016 (the report was published on 22 March 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.