• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Doncaster Community Support

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 5, M&M Business Park, Doncaster Road, Kirk Sandall, Doncaster, DN3 1HR (01733) 873700

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Report from 15 January 2025 assessment

On this page

Caring

Good

22 April 2025

Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Kindness, compassion and dignity

Score: 3

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to ensure lessons were learnt. Following accidents and incidents, support plans and risk assessments were updated to reflect any changes. One staff member said, “We have a debrief with staff after incidents to look for triggers and look at how things could be done different in the future.”

Treating people as individuals

Score: 3

The provider treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. They took account of people’s strengths, abilities, aspirations, culture and unique backgrounds and protected characteristics. Each person had the opportunity to show case their achievements at an annual reflection event. Any goals not met or new ones to aspire to were transferred to a development plan and staff continued to support people to meet their desired goals.

Independence, choice and control

Score: 3

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to ensure lessons were learnt. Following accidents and incidents, support plans and risk assessments were updated to reflect any changes. One staff member said, “We have a debrief with staff after incidents to look for triggers and look at how things could be done different in the future.”

Responding to people’s immediate needs

Score: 3

The provider listened to and understood people’s needs, views and wishes. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress. Staff told us people were allocated a number of hours of support by their social workers. Staff felt comfortable contacting external professionals to request more hours when needs changed. One relative told us, “They [staff] respond straight away when [family member] needs them. They communicate with us, and we discuss the next steps.”

Workforce wellbeing and enablement

Score: 3

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to ensure lessons were learnt. Following accidents and incidents, support plans and risk assessments were updated to reflect any changes. One staff member said, “We have a debrief with staff after incidents to look for triggers and look at how things could be done different in the future.”