The Care Quality Commission
  • Services in your home
  • Homecare service

We Do Care (London) Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 The Parade, High Street, Cowley, Uxbridge, UB8 2EP 0800 086 9745

Provided and run by:
We Do Care (London) Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 20 to 26 November 2025.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, 10 people were using the service.

The service is registered to provide support to people with a learning disability. At the time of our assessment, no one with a learning disability was using the service.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 10 April 2025). At the last assessment, we identified breaches of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, staffing and good governance. We took action telling the provider they must make improvements.

At this assessment, we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer breaching legal regulations. The new rating for the service is good.

Risks to people’s safety were assessed and planned for. The provider responded when things went wrong. They investigated accidents, incidents and complaints. Improvements were made to the service because of these investigations.

There were enough staff to care for people and keep them safe. Staff completed a range of training to understand about their roles and responsibilities.

Medicines were managed in a safe way.

Staff assessed and planned for people’s needs, including their health needs. Staff worked with other professionals to share information.

People were able to make choices. People were supported to be independent. Staff met people’s needs.

There were effective systems for monitoring and improving the quality of the service.

During an assessment under our new approach

We Do Care (London) Ltd is a homecare agency providing personal care and support to older people living with dementia, learning disabilities and physical disabilities. Date of Assessment: 20 January 2025.There were 23 people receiving support with personal care. This assessment was carried out without a visit to the location’s office. We used telephone calls to enable us to engage with people using the service, relatives and staff, and electronic file sharing to enable us to review documentation. The last rating for this service was good (published 6 July 2023). At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. We carried out this assessment as part of our routine schedule of assessments. We found 3 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to staffing, safe care and treatment and good governance. The provider did not always assess or mitigate risks to people's health and safety. Staff were not always provided with the training they needed to provide safe and good quality care. The provider’s governance systems and audits were not effective in identifying issues that needed improvement and help ensure that people were not placed at risk of receiving unsafe and inappropriate care. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website.

14 May 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: We Do Care (London) Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes in the London Boroughs of Ealing and Hillingdon. This is a private limited company and Head Office is the only registered location. At the time of our inspection, 11 older people were using the service.

People’s experience of using this service:

People using the service and their relatives were happy with the care and support they received. They liked the staff who cared for them, who were kind, caring and supportive. People were involved in planning their own care and making decisions about this. People said the care workers arrived on time and stayed for the agreed length of time.

People using the service and their relatives felt safe. They received the support they needed with medicines and these were managed in a safe way. The risks to their safety and wellbeing, as well as their care needs, had been assessed and planned for. Care plans were regularly reviewed and updated following changes.

There were enough suitable staff working at the service. There were appropriate checks on staff as part of the recruitment and selections. The staff took part in inductions and training which helped them to understand their roles and responsibilities.

The service was appropriately managed. We Do Care (London) Ltd was a small family run business. The registered manager was involved in providing care and working alongside the other staff. People using the service and their relatives knew the manager and felt able to raise concerns or discuss changes they wanted. There were effective systems to gather their feedback, and the feedback of staff. Staff were regularly assessed in the work place and had meetings with their line manager. The provider undertook a number of audits to make sure safety and quality were assessed and improved when needed.

Rating at last inspection: The service was rated requires improvement at the last inspection of 12 June 2018 (Published 18 July 2018).

Why we inspected: We carried out this inspection as part of our scheduled plan of inspections based on the last rating.

Follow up: We will continue with our ongoing monitoring of the service and inspect again in line with our scheduled plan of inspections based on the new rating, or sooner if needed.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

12 June 2018

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection took place on 11 and 15 June 2018. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we wanted to make sure someone would be available to speak with us. This was the first inspection since the service registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 February 2017.

Head Office provides a domiciliary care service for older people living in their own homes in the community. The service offers support to people who require help with day to day care including personal care and meal preparation. At the time of our inspection there were three people using the service who were receiving personal care.

The service is required to have a registered manager and there was one in post who was also a director of the company. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff recruitment procedures were not always followed to ensure only suitable staff were employed by the service. Auditing and monitoring processes were not robust so shortfalls were not always being identified and addressed in a timely way.

Staff undertook training, however the timeliness of some training was not always appropriate to ensure staff completed the training as part of the induction process.

People and relatives said they felt people were being cared for safely. Staff understood safeguarding procedures and were clear to report any concerns. Risk assessments for risks to people and for their home environment were carried out to maintain people’s safety. Staff understood infection control procedures and followed them. Incidents and any other events were reviewed and learned from so action could be taken to minimise the risk of recurrence.

People were assessed so their needs were identified and care and support could be planned to meet them. People and relatives were happy as they felt that staff had the skills and knowledge to care for people effectively.

Staff assisted people with simple meal preparation where required. If people were unwell, staff were clear to seek medical help including calling the emergency service if required.

Processes were in place for assessing people’s capacity to make decisions for themselves and staff understood the importance of people making choices about their care and treatment and reporting any concerns that could arise around a person’s deteriorating mental health.

People and relatives said staff were very caring and treated people with dignity and respect, taking time with people and making them feel well cared for and listened to. People were encouraged to maintain their independence and staff understood their individual needs and wishes.

Care plans identified the care and support each person required and people and relatives confirmed staff got to know about people’s backgrounds, interests and any religious or cultural needs. There was a complaints procedure in place and people and relatives confirmed they would feel confident to raise any concerns with the registered manager.

People and relatives were very happy with the service and felt that communication was good and their opinions were listened to. Staff said they enjoyed working for the service and felt well supported by the managers and directors. Policies and procedures were in place and reflected current good practice guidance and legislation.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These were in relation to fit and proper persons employed and good governance. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.