• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Lifeways Community Care Ltd (Leicester)

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

Unit 9, Warren Park Way, Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE19 4SA 07805 408704

Provided and run by:
Lifeways Community Care Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
Important:

We took urgent enforcement action to impose conditions on Lifeways Community Care LTD (Leicester). They failed to ensure people received safe care and treatment, and the lack of effective management oversight and governance systems left people at a significant risk of harm.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of inspection 27, 28 July 2026 3,4 August 2026. The inspection of this location was prompted due to ongoing concerns and known management issues. We undertook a comprehensive inspection.

Lifeways Community Care Limited (Leicester) provides personal care for people living in their own tenancies in either individual dwellings or shared accommodation. The service provides support to autistic people and to people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 10 people receiving the regulated activity of personal care. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted.

Risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing were not consistently managed. Risk assessments and care plans did not always reflect people's current needs or provide staff with clear guidance on how to mitigate known risks. Unsafe care practices were observed during the inspection. This included inappropriate moving and repositioning techniques and medicines administration practices which increased the risk of avoidable harm.

Safeguarding systems were not always effective. Actions identified following safeguarding concerns had not always been completed in a timely manner, and management oversight of safeguarding incidents was inconsistent, resulting in delays in protecting people from harm.

Staff were not always trained, competent or supported to meet people's needs safely. Staff undertaking delegated healthcare tasks, including the administration of emergency medicines, had not completed the required training or competency assessments.

People were not always supported to receive their medicines safely. Systems and guidance for the management of complex medicines were not always in place, creating a risk medicines would not be administered in line with prescribed instructions. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to medicine management. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. ​

Leadership and governance arrangements were ineffective. High turnover of service and area managers resulted in instability, limited oversight and a failure to sustain improvements, reducing leaders' understanding of risks and service performance. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to audits and oversight. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. ​

This service is in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a time-frame within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

During an assessment under our new approach

Lifeways Community Care Ltd (Leicester) is a supported living service providing a regulated activity of personal care. The service was providing care and support to people in their own homes. We carried out this assessment due to concerns we received about keeping people safe and the management of the service. We completed our assessment from 15 April to 25 April 2024. We assessed a total of 10 quality statements from the safe, effective, responsive and well-led key questions and found areas of good practice and concern. The scores for these areas have been combined with scores based on the key question ratings from the last inspection. Though the assessment of these 10 quality statements indicated areas of concern and good practice since the last inspection, our overall rating remains good.

The inspection team included 2 inspectors and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. We received feedback from the local authority quality monitoring team. During the assessment process we visited 4 supported living houses and spoke with 7 people and 4 relatives. We observed how people were being cared for and supported. The service is a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

14 October 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Lifeways Community Care Ltd (Leicester) provides personal care and support to younger and older people living with physical and learning disabilities, mental health needs, autisim and dementia. People were living in their own homes or within supported living accommodation. The service was supporting 200 people. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

People were protected from the risk of abuse and from potential discrimination. Risks people faced had been assessed and those identified were safely managed. Medicines were managed safely. Staff showed a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities of keeping people safe from harm. Staff had been safely recruited and staffing levels were maintained. People were supported to take their medicines and protected from the risk of infections.

Staff received a range of training appropriate to their role and people's needs, and were supported to develop through regular supervision. People were encouraged and supported to maintain good nutrition and hydration and access the healthcare they needed to stay well.

Staff were respectful and communicated effectively to support people to make choices and decisions about their care and support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff knew people well and were described as caring and respectful by people and relatives. People were at the centre of the service and involved in all aspects of the care and support provided. The service was effective at promoting people's independence. People had made significant achievements with the support of staff.

The service provided people with personalised care that met their needs and took account of their wishes. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills, and become more independent, to achieve the best possible outcomes. People and relatives were supported to make complaints and raise concerns. These were used to drive improvements within the service.

Effective systems were in place to consistently monitor and review the standard of care and support provided. The leadership of the service promoted a positive culture that was person-centred and inclusive. The manager and the staff team showed a desire to improve on the service provided and in turn the quality of life experiences for the people using the service.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 22 April 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

28 March 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected the service on 28 and 30 March 2017. The inspection was announced on both days. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides domiciliary care as well as a supported living service for people requiring personal care; we needed to be sure that someone would be in.

Lifeways Community Care is a home care agency and supported living service that supports adults who live with a learning disability, autism or mental health issues. At the time of our inspection there were 141 people using the service

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People and their relatives told us that they felt safe. Staff were aware of their responsibility to keep people safe. Safe recruitment practices were followed.

Risk associated with activities of people’s care had been assessed and measures were in place to prevent avoidable harm. The environment and equipment was checked and maintained in order to keep people safe.

Staff had received training and supervision to meet the needs of the people who used the service. Staff told us that they felt supported.

People received their medicines as required. Medicines were administered safely by staff who were appropriately trained and competent to do so. People were supported to manage their medicines where they were able to.

People’s health needs were met and when necessary, outside health professionals were contacted for support. People were supported to have enough to eat and drink and follow healthy diets.

People were supported in line with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA). People’s capacity to consent to their care had been assessed when there was a reasonable belief that they may not be able to make a specific decision.

People were supported by staff who understood that they should be treated with dignity and respect. People’s independence was promoted and encouraged.

People were supported to pursue their interests and remain active. Staff supported people to access educational, vocational and leisure activities. People’s aspirations were recognised and respected.

People had been asked for feedback about the service. They were activity involved and consulted in the running of the service. Staff were involved in the recruitment of their staff.

People received care and support that was centred on them as individuals. People were involved in planning and reviewing their care. Staff had a clear understanding of their role and how to support people as individuals.

People felt that the service was well-led. They knew how to complain should they have needed to and had confidence that their concerns would be addressed.

Staff felt supported and that communication between them and the registered manager was good. They were clear on their role, the expectations of them and the aims and objectives of the service.

Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service being provided and drive improvement.

The registered manger was aware of their responsibility to report events that occurred within the service to CQC and external agencies.