• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Warwickshire Supported Living

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 21, Athena Court, Athena Drive, Tachbrook Park, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV34 6RT (01926) 429512

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Warwickshire Supported Living is a supported living service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection there were 9 people receiving personal care.

Who the service is for

This is a specialist service for younger and older people with a learning disability and autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 17 and 21 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remained accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Risks were assessed and people were involved in the process. For example, staff considered how best to support people when they became anxious and adapted their approach in response to the individual’s reactions and needs at the time. Medicines were administered safely and there were systems in place to ensure the environment was safe for people and the staff supporting them.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. Staff were confident senior staff would take prompt action to support people, if required. People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. Where people are cared for in their own homes, this is done through The Court of Protection. Some Local Authorities refer to these as “Community Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)”, which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We found staff and management worked within the MCA. Systems were in place to identify and manage restrictions on people's liberty, including seeking Community DoLS authorisations where necessary. At the time of our inspection, no one was subject to a Community DoLS authorisation. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

Staff assessed and reviewed people’s needs and developed care plans to support staff to understand how to care for people safely. Where concerns were identified regarding people’s health, nutrition or fluid intake, staff worked with other health and social care professionals, including speech and language therapists and learning disability social workers, to ensure people received the support they needed. Staff monitored key aspects of people’s health and wellbeing to inform ongoing care and identify any changes in their needs. Staff also understood the importance of seeking people’s consent before providing care and support.

People were supported by compassionate and caring staff who recognised that the way support was provided to 1 person could affect others they lived with. Staff considered the needs of everyone using the service and adapted their approach to ensure each person felt valued, respected and included.

Staff spoke respectfully and kindly about people and valued the relationships they had developed with them. Staff respected and promoted people’s dignity and recognised that some people valued spending time alone. Staff balanced people’s needs for support with their right to independence.

Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s preferences and what mattered to them. They used this knowledge when caring for people, so they received person-centred care. Staff knew how to manage any concerns people raised to ensure they were addressed them promptly.

Staff understood the unique challenges people faced and took action to advocate on their behalf, helping to ensure they were treated fairly and had equitable access to services. One staff member described how they supported people to receive appropriate care from other health and social care organisations, saying, “You explain about people and then get the appointments [person’s name] needs.”

Staff described a leadership approach which focused on the needs of people using the service. One staff member told us the way the service was led showed them that, “[Managers] want the best for people.” Staff reported receiving good levels of support and access to advice when needed. This enabled them to support people safely, seek guidance from managers, and share learning through communication books, IT platforms and staff meetings. Staff gave examples of learning from their own practice and experiences, which had been shared tactfully and constructively following incidents or errors. They described an open culture in which incidents and near misses were viewed as opportunities for learning and continuous improvement.

The registered manager, service managers and provider completed checks on the quality and safety of the service. These including checking people received their medicines as prescribed, their finances were managed safely, and safety incidents and near misses were suitably managed. The registered manager and senior staff visited people in their own homes to check on the quality of the care they received. Following feedback from the inspector, the registered manager planned to further develop processes to ensure care calls were always delivered as planned to further check staff practice regarding use of foot plates on wheelchairs. This was to help ensure the registered manager was fully assured of people’s safety.

29 April 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Warwickshire Supported Living is registered as a domiciliary care service which provides personal care to people in their own homes and supported living accommodation. At the time of our inspection 13 people were being supported with personal care.

People’s experience of using this service:

Staff vacancies had recently improved. Although there had been a reliance on agency workers, people now received care from staff that knew them well.

Staff were recruited safely, and processes checked the background of potential new staff.

Staff understood how to keep people safe and how to report any concerns they may have.

Staff knew about the risks associated with people’s health and wellbeing and understood how to minimise risks to them.

Accidents and incidents had been recorded and any immediate action had been taken to reduce the risk of the event happening again. Overall analysis to identify patterns and trends were being improved.

Staff supported people to take their medicines in line with their personal preferences. Where medication errors had occurred, medical advice had been sought to ensure people’s safety.

Staff understood how to prevent the spread of infection.

People’s needs were assessed to ensure they could be met by the service.

Staff received a thorough induction and had access to the training and guidance they needed to complete their role well.

People made their own decisions about their care and were supported by staff who understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People were offered choices. For example, in the meals and drinks they were offered.

Staff respected people’s rights to privacy and dignity.

People received information about the service in a way that was appropriate to their needs.

Care plans were personalised and contained the information and guidance staff needed to support people to achieve their goals and aspirations.

Systems were in place to manage and respond to any complaints or concerns raised.

The registered manager had systems and processes to monitor quality within the home. Any identified issues were addressed.

The registered manager understood their regulatory responsibilities and shared information with stakeholders. However, there was one occasion had not been done in a timely way.

Lessons had been learned when things went wrong.

Rating at last inspection:

Good. (The last report was published on 11 November 2016).

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection to confirm that the service remained good.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

27 October 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 27 October 2016. The inspection was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice of our inspection. This was to make sure we could meet with the manager of the service and care workers on the day of our office visit.

The service was last inspected on 30 January 2014, when we found the provider was compliant with the essential standards described in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.

Warwickshire Supported Living is registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes, including supported living locations. At the time of our visit the agency supported 17 people with personal care. Support hours provided by the agency depended on people’s assessed needs. Some people required 24 hour support.

The service had a registered manager. A requirement of the provider’s registration is that they have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider regularly sought feedback from people and relatives. There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service provided.

There were enough suitably qualified care workers to meet people’s needs effectively. People received their care and support from care workers who they knew, and at the times needed. The provider conducted pre-employment checks prior to staff starting work, to ensure their suitability to support people in their homes.

The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the relevant requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Care workers gained people’s consent before they provided personal care and knew how to support people to make decisions.

People and relatives told us they felt safe using the service and care workers understood how to protect people from abuse. Risks to people’s safety inside and outside their homes were identified and care workers understood how these should be managed. Systems were in place to manage people’s medicines safely and care workers had received training to do this.

People were supported with dignity and respect. People were enabled to live as independently as possible, according to their needs and abilities. People told us care workers were caring, understood their needs and supported them to achieve their goals.

Care workers completed training considered essential to meet people’s needs safely and effectively. Care workers completed an induction when they joined the service and had their practice regularly checked by a member of the management team.

Care workers supported people to see healthcare professionals when needed and people who required support had enough to eat and drink.

People were involved in planning and reviewing their care. Care plans and risk assessments contained relevant information for care workers to help them provide the care and support people required. Changes to people’s care and support needs in some care records were not clearly documented. The service manager was taking action to rectify this.

People knew how to raise any concerns and were confident these would be listened and responded to effectively. People and relatives did not have any complaints about the service

People, relative’s and care workers felt the management team were approachable. Care workers felt valued because the management team listened to their views.