We carried out a review of the data available to us about Austin Ben - Stoke on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Austin Ben - Stoke, you can give feedback on this service.
Austin Ben – Stoke is a domiciliary care service that was providing personal and nursing care to 90 people living in their own homes at the time of the inspection. Both younger and older people had a range of support needs such as those with dementia or a physical disability, people with mental health needs, sensory impairments, and children between the ages of 13 to 18. Of those 90 people, 32 of them had support with their medicines from staff.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and medicines, for example.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People were supported with their medicines safely. People had plans in place, staff were trained, and records were generally well completed. The provider planned to improve the format of recording follow up actions from audits, as these were recorded differently by different staff.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Why we inspected
The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about medicines management. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.
We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe section of the full report.
We use targeted inspections to check concerns. They do not look at an entire key question, only the part of the key question we are specifically concerned about. Targeted inspections do not change the rating from the previous inspection. This is because they do not assess all areas of a key question.
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Austin Ben - Stoke on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Recommendations
We have made a recommendation for the provider to review all instructions for ‘when required’ medicines and instructions for medicines.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.
Austin Ben - Stoke is a domiciliary care service that was providing personal care to 51 people living in their own homes at the time of the inspection. People had a range of support needs such as people living with mental health needs and older and younger adults.
People’s experience of using this service:
Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor people’s care. Staff knew people’s needs, but this needed to be included in some people’s care plans. The provider had already started to make these improvements following our feedback.
People felt safe and risks were planned for. There were enough staff to ensure people received timely support and staff were recruited safely. People received their medicines. Lessons were learned when things went wrong. People were protected from cross infection as appropriate measures were in place which staff followed.
People had their needs assessed and had access to other healthcare professionals when needed. People were supported to have food and drinks of their choice. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) were generally being followed and improvements made based on our feedback.
People were supported by kind and caring staff and were treated with respect. People had a choice and were able to make decisions about their care and were being supported to remain independent.
People received support that met their needs. People could complain when they needed to and complaints were investigated and dealt with. A policy and template care plans were in place ready for if someone needed to plan for their end of life wishes.
People, relatives and staff found the office staff and the registered manager approachable. The provider worked in partnership with organisations and sought feedback from people who used the service to make improvements.
Rating at last inspection:
The service was last rated as requires improvement overall (April 2017).
Why we inspected:
We planned the inspection based on the previous rating.
Recommendations:
• We have made a recommendation that quality assurance systems identify all areas for improvement.
Follow up:
We will continue to monitor the service and check our recommendations have been followed at our next inspection.
Austin Ben – Stoke is registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. There were 60 people using the service on the day of our inspection.
People did not always feel the care and support provided reflected their individual needs. Some people voiced frustration over the lack of predictable call times and regular staff. People, their relatives and staff gave mixed views about the management of the service. They did not always have confidence in the management team’s willingness to act on issues brought to their attention. Most staff we spoke with were concerned about the amount of travel time allocated between calls.
People were protected from the risks of harm and abuse. Staff understood how to recognise and report any actual or suspected abuse. The risks associated with people’s care and support needs had been assessed with them individually, and plans implemented to manage these. The provider had put procedures in place to ensure information on any changes in risk was shared with relevant staff. The provider followed safe recruitment practices to ensure staff were suitable to work with people. The majority of people received the support they needed to take their prescribed medicines.
Staff participated in a structured induction and an ongoing programme of training. They had the skills and knowledge needed to perform their job roles and meet people’s individual care and support needs. Staff sought people’s consent to care and respected their right to make their own decisions and choices. People’s nutritional needs were assessed and plans put in place to address these. Staff played a positive role in helping people to maintain good health.
Staff adopted a kind and compassionate approach towards their work. They took the time to get to know people well and treated them with dignity and respect. People and their relatives were encouraged to participate in care planning and decisions that affected them.
People’s care plans contained information about what was important to them as individuals, along with their individual care and support needs. Staff told us they had the time to read, and followed, these care plans. People and their relatives knew how to complain about the service. The provider had developed formal procedures for handling any such complaints.
The registered manager and location manager demonstrated a good understanding of the duties and responsibilities associated with their posts. The provider had developed quality assurance systems and procedures to enable them to assess, monitor and address the quality of the service people received.