• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Austin Ben - Stoke

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 7, Brindley Court, Lymedale Business Park, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 9QA 0300 365 0008

Provided and run by:
Austin Ben Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 10 May 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This was a targeted inspection to check whether the provider was supporting people appropriately with their medicines, following concerns received about this.

Inspection team

Two inspectors visited the provider’s office. Two inspectors also made telephone calls to people, relatives, and staff to gain their feedback.

Service and service type

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides nursing and personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service less than 24 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure the documentation we wanted to view would be available.

Inspection activity started on 23 February 2023 and ended on 3 March 2023. We visited the location’s office on 23 February 2023.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. We asked the local authority for their feedback and they shared information they had received recently. We also asked Healthwatch for feedback about the service. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. They did not have any information to share. We looked at information we had received about the service, such as notifications. Notifications are events the provider is required to tell us about. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We had contact with 2 people who used the service to gain their views about the care they received. We also spoke with 5 relatives to determine their thoughts. We reviewed the care and medicine records for 8 people.

We spoke with 10 staff, including care workers, senior care workers, the registered manager and the nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider. We also reviewed the provider’s medicine policy.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 10 May 2023

About the service:

Austin Ben - Stoke is a domiciliary care service that was providing personal care to 51 people living in their own homes at the time of the inspection. People had a range of support needs such as people living with mental health needs and older and younger adults.

People’s experience of using this service:

Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor people’s care. Staff knew people’s needs, but this needed to be included in some people’s care plans. The provider had already started to make these improvements following our feedback.

People felt safe and risks were planned for. There were enough staff to ensure people received timely support and staff were recruited safely. People received their medicines. Lessons were learned when things went wrong. People were protected from cross infection as appropriate measures were in place which staff followed.

People had their needs assessed and had access to other healthcare professionals when needed. People were supported to have food and drinks of their choice. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) were generally being followed and improvements made based on our feedback.

People were supported by kind and caring staff and were treated with respect. People had a choice and were able to make decisions about their care and were being supported to remain independent.

People received support that met their needs. People could complain when they needed to and complaints were investigated and dealt with. A policy and template care plans were in place ready for if someone needed to plan for their end of life wishes.

People, relatives and staff found the office staff and the registered manager approachable. The provider worked in partnership with organisations and sought feedback from people who used the service to make improvements.

Rating at last inspection:

The service was last rated as requires improvement overall (April 2017).

Why we inspected:

We planned the inspection based on the previous rating.

Recommendations:

• We have made a recommendation that quality assurance systems identify all areas for improvement.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor the service and check our recommendations have been followed at our next inspection.