• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Ghyll Court Residential Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Wells Walk, Ilkley, West Yorkshire, LS29 9LH (01943) 607059

Provided and run by:
Ghyll Court Residential Home Limited

All Inspections

22 April 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 22 April 2015 and was unannounced. At the time of the inspection there were 13 people living at the home. The last inspection was in October 2013, at that time the home was meeting the legal requirements of the areas inspected.

Ghyll Court Residential Home is a converted, extended property situated close to Ilkley town centre. The home provides care for up to 14 older people, including people living with dementia. There are 12 single bedrooms and one twin bedroom.

The registered manager is also the owner of the home and lives on site. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected from abuse and staff were aware of how to recognise and respond to allegations or suspicions of abuse. People’s legal rights were protected and the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards were met.

The required checks were completed before new staff started work and this helped to ensure people were protected from the risks of being cared for by staff who were not suitable to work in a care home. Staff were trained and supported to help them understand and meet the needs of people living at the home. There were enough staff and people told us staff were kind, compassionate and friendly.

People received their medicines when they needed them. With certain medicines it is important to record the time they are given to make sure there is an adequate gap between doses. We found the time of administration of these medicines was not always recorded. We discussed this with the registered manager who said they would take action to address.

People were provided with a comfortable and pleasant environment in which to live, the home was clean and free of unpleasant odours.

People were offered a variety of nutritious food and drink which took account of their individual needs and preferences and people told us they enjoyed the food.

People were given the support they needed to access the full range of NHS services which helped to ensure their health care needs were identified and met.

People’s privacy and dignity were respected, people were asked for their consent before care was delivered and staff were kind and caring in their interactions with people. People were supported to maintain their independence and where indicated had access to advocacy services. People were able to receive visitors at any time and relatives told us they were always made to feel welcome.

Staff knew about people’s needs and care was delivered in accordance with people’s care plans. People who lived at the home and/or their relatives were involved in planning care and people’s relatives were kept informed of changes in people’s needs.

People were aware of how to make a complaint and complaints were recorded and dealt with.

The provider/registered manager was involved in the day to day running of the home and promoted a culture of openness and transparency. The views of people who used the service were actively sought and action was taken in response to their feedback. Staff told us they were supported and enjoyed working at the home. Some improvements were needed to the systems for monitoring and assessing the quality and safety of the services provided.

15 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who used the service and one person’s relatives. People told us they had no concerns about the service. They said the staff were kind and told us they felt safe.

One person told us they were aware of, but not disturbed by, the night staff checking to make sure they were all right. They said they were “Very, very well looked after”. They told us their weight was checked regularly and said they saw the district nurse at least once a week.

People told us the food was good and said they enjoyed their meals.

People told us they were listened to and would have no hesitation in talking to the manager if they had any concerns. They said their wishes were respected, for example if they wanted to stay in their rooms for part of all of the day they were supported to do so.

We found people’s privacy and dignity was respected, for example people were supported to see their visitors in private.

We found people's care needs were assessed and care was delivered in line with their identified needs and preferences.

We found the home was clean and free of unpleasant odours.

We found the home was well maintained and there were suitable arrangements in place for the maintenance and servicing of essential equipment.

We found there were arrangements in place to obtain and respond to the views of the people who used the service and/or their representatives.

13 November 2012

During a routine inspection

During the visit we talked with three people who used the service and one person’s relatives. One person said “it’s very good here” and another said “it couldn’t be better”. People told us the staff were kind and said they were well looked after, one person said the manager was “wonderful”. One person told us they enjoyed the quizzes but chose not to join in the weekly exercise class. Relatives told us they could not fault the care. They said they home was always clean and the food was “excellent”. The people we spoke with told us they would not hesitate to talk to the manager if they had any concerns. They were confident their concerns would be taken seriously and acted on. The people we spoke with did not raise any concerns about their medicines.