• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Fen Grove

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

76 Fen Grove, Sidcup, Kent, DA15 8QQ

Provided and run by:
Avenues London

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 11 April 2018

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 14 February 2018 and was unannounced. One inspector and an expert by experience inspected. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Before the inspection we looked at all the information we held about the service. This information included the statutory notifications that the service sent to the Care Quality Commission. A notification is information about important events that the service is required to send us by law. The provider had completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We also contacted health and social care professionals involved in people’s support, and the local authority safeguarding team for their feedback about the service. We used this information to help inform our inspection planning.

During our inspection we spent time observing the support being provided to people. We also spoke with one person and two relatives, two members of staff, one external healthcare professional, the registered manager and the area manager. We looked at two people’s care records and four staff records. We also looked at records related to the management of the service such as the administration of medicines, accidents and incidents reports, Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisations, health and safety records, and the provider’s policies and procedures.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 11 April 2018

This inspection took place on 14 February 2018 and was unannounced. 76 Fen Grove provides accommodation for people who require nursing or personal care for up to four adults who have a range of needs including learning disabilities. The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. At the time of the inspection the home was providing care and support to four people.

At our last inspection of this service on 29 December 2015 the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found the service remained Good. The home demonstrated they continued to meet the regulations and fundamental standards.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff knew how to keep people safe. The service had clear procedures to support staff to recognise and respond to abuse. The registered manager and staff completed safeguarding training. Staff completed risk assessments for every person who used the service and they were up to date with detailed guidance for staff to reduce risks.

The service had an effective system to manage accidents and incidents, and to prevent them happening again. The provider carried out comprehensive background checks of staff before they started working and there were enough staff to support to people.

Medicines were managed appropriately and people were receiving their medicines as prescribed. Staff received medicines management training and their competency was checked. All medicines were stored safely. The service had arrangements to deal with emergencies and staff were aware of the provider’s infection control procedures and they maintained the premises safely.

The provider trained staff to support people and meet their needs. The provider supported staff through regular supervision and appraisal.

People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support them in the least restrictive way possible and the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

Staff assessed people’s nutritional needs and supported them to maintain a balanced diet. Staff supported people to access the healthcare services they required, and monitored their healthcare appointments. The registered manager and staff liaised with external health and social care professionals to meet people’s needs.

People, and where appropriate their relatives were involved in the assessment, planning and review of their care. Staff considered people’s choices, health and social care needs, and their general wellbeing.

Staff supported people in a way which was kind, caring, and respectful. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity.

The provider recognised people’s need for stimulation and social interaction. People were supported to maintain relationships with people that mattered to them. People's needs were reviewed and monitored on a regular basis. The service had a clear policy and procedure about managing complaints. People knew how to complain and told us they would do so if necessary.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided. People's views about the service were sought and considered through meetings and satisfaction surveys. Staff felt supported by the registered manager. The service worked effectively with health and social care professionals, and commissioners.