Pattom Limited

Pattom Ltd is a care service providing personal care to adults, children and young adults, who live with learning and sensory impairments, mental health and autistic spectrum disorder in their own homes. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting six people with personal care.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Pattom Ltd had an excellent manager who provided clear leadership and direction, creating a strong person centred culture which achieved good outcomes for people. Relatives spoke very highly of the service and the positive difference it had made to theirs, and their loved ones’ lives. Person centred support plans took account of people’s learning and visual impairments to help them maintain independence. The registered manager had developed excellent links with local community groups and sporting organisations which provided wider opportunities for people to participate in their community, improve physical wellbeing and reduce isolation. People’s support plans reflected their assessed needs and included their likes, dislikes, preferences and wishes. Relatives had no complaints but where there had been any minor issues they had felt listened to and issues had been resolved promptly.

The registered manager had encouraged an open and transparent culture which enabled people, relatives and staff to contribute with honest feedback and share ideas which helped to develop the service and drive improvement. Staff told us they felt well supported and genuinely valued by the management team who were hands on and approachable.

Relatives told us they thought their loved ones were safe in the care of their support staff. Where there were risks to people’s health and wellbeing, these had been assessed and action had been taken to mitigate these risks. Robust recruitment processes were in place which enabled the provider to make safer recruitment decisions. Staff understood how to identify and report abuse appropriately. Where people required assistance with their medicines, this was well managed.

Staff received supervision and training which enabled them to deliver effective care. People’s needs were assessed before their care package commenced to identify and agree the care they required which promoted maximum choice and control of their lives. People and/or their relatives were asked for their consent for day to day care. People were supported by staff to eat and drink where required.

Relatives told us they very happy with the care their loved ones received. Staff treated people with dignity and respect, involved them in decisions about their care and promoted their independence.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (Published 16/6/2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Pattom Ltd on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Pattom Limited is a domiciliary care agency, providing care and support services to people with varying disabilities and needs. This includes people with a learning disability, a mental health condition and the elderly. On the day of inspection the agency were supporting four people with the regulated activity of personal care.

This was the first time we have inspected this service since they changed their registration. The service was registered with CQC in April 2015.

On the day of inspection we met the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. On the day of the inspection visit, the provider supported this manager to explain how the service operated and was managed.

People told us they felt safe with the staff that came to their home. Staff were trained in safeguarding and understood the signs of abuse and their responsibilities to keep people safe. Recruitment practices were followed that helped ensure only suitable staff were employed at the service.

Risks of harm to people were identified at the initial assessment of care and their care plans included the actions staff would take to minimise the risks. Staff understood people's needs and abilities because they had the opportunity to get to know people well through shadowing experienced staff during induction before working with them independently.

People were supported by regular members of staff who supported people in a timely manner. Staff were trained in medicines management, to ensure they knew how to support people to take their medicines safely to keep accurate records.

Staff received the training and support they needed to meet people's needs effectively. Staff felt supported by management team and were encouraged to consider their own personal development.

The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff had a good understanding of MCA and DoLS. When people lacked capacity the best interest process was followed.

People were supported to eat meals of their choice and staff understood the importance of people having sufficient nutrition and hydration. Staff referred people to healthcare professionals for advice and support when their health needs changed.

People told us staff were kind and respected their privacy, dignity and independence. Care staff were thoughtful and recognised and respected people's wishes and preferences.

People and relatives said that the service was responsive to their needs. The service assessed people’s needs so they received support when they needed it. People received person centred care from a service that had a flexible approach as staff often extended support sessions when needed.

People knew how to complain and were confident any complaints would be listened to and action taken to resolve them. When areas of improvement were recognised plans were put in place to resolve them.

People and relatives agreed that the service was managed well. Management understood the service being provided. Staff and management talked about the vision and values of promoting independence. The support we observed was in line with the vision and values.

The provider's quality monitoring system focused on the experience of people. It included asking people for their views about the quality of the service and on site supervisions, which helped improved the service provided to people.