• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Healey Supported Living Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Arncliffe Road, Batley, West Yorkshire, WF17 7HT 0300 304 7927

Provided and run by:
Home Group Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Healey Supporting Living Service is a supported living service, arranged across multiple self-contained flats, supporting independent living while providing access to shared communal facilities. The service has a maximum capacity of 8 people and were at maximum capacity at the time of the inspection. There were 5 people supported with personal care during the inspection period. The service environment included a communal lounge which acted as a central hub for people using the service. The space was used for a range of activities, including group sessions, social events and meetings, supporting engagement and community inclusion. Additional features, such as small animals and organised events, further promoted a homely and inclusive atmosphere.

Staff were exceptionally caring and placed emphasis on highly person-centred care. Staff described a strong emphasis on promoting independence, inclusion and choice, with people actively involved in shaping their care and daily lives. Care was described as tailored to the individual, ensuring people’s homes and lifestyles reflected their preferences.

Records showed people were supported to engage in meaningful activities, maintain relationships and access community opportunities, including work placements and organised events. People’s likes, dislikes and factors affecting their emotional wellbeing were documented to guide staff in providing personalised care.

The service promoted a positive and open culture. Staff were encouraged to report concerns and reflect on practice. Regular team meetings, supervision and recognition initiatives supported staff wellbeing and development. Staff spoke highly of the management team.

There were effective governance and oversight arrangements in place. Regular audits were undertaken across areas such as health and safety, infection prevention and control, and medicines management. External oversight and internal quality assurance processes supported compliance with regulatory requirements. Fire safety checks and drills were completed in line with expected frequencies.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

7 August 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected Healey Supported Living Service on 07 August 2017. The inspection was unannounced; this meant the service did not know we were coming. The service was registered in 2015 and this was the first inspection.

The service consists of a block of eight purpose built flats over three floors in a building staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Each person’s flat was self-contained with one bedroom. On the ground floor there was a communal lounge and kitchen area people used to socialise in with each other. At the rear of the building was an enclosed garden area with a lawn and seating area which overlooked the local cemetery.

People using the service had chosen the name Hilltop View for the building and this is how it was known to them, their relatives and staff. At the time of this inspection there were seven people living at Hilltop View, but only three were being supported with their personal care.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and relatives agreed. Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse. Risk to people had been assessed and managed.

Medicines were managed and administered safely. The service had worked with community healthcare professionals to safely reduce the number of medicines one person took.

Staffing at the service was adequate and recruitment procedures were robust.

Staff told us, and records confirmed, support workers received the induction, training and ongoing support they needed to provide people with effective care.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People had access to a range of healthcare professionals to help meet their wider health needs. The service supported people to make meals and provided information and education around healthy eating.

Relatives and healthcare professionals we spoke with told us staff at the service were caring. People we spoke with told us they were happy at Hilltop View and we found the atmosphere at the service was inclusive and homely.

People were directly involved in designing and reviewing their goal support plans and risk assessments. Quarterly review meetings were held and individuals decided who they wanted to attend.

The service focused on increasing people’s independence. It also raised awareness of equality and diversity issues, and ensured people had access to advocacy services when they needed them.

No formal complaints had been made about the service. Relatives told us they could feedback to the service at any time and any issues they had experienced in the past had been resolved.

People had been involved in developing an easy to read complaints leaflet. The service checked people had understood the complaints process.

People’s care files contained detailed person-centred information about how they wished to be supported. Communication passports and hospital passports were in place in case people needed to transition between services.

People allocated hours for activities as part of their care packages had access to a range of activity opportunities at the service and in the community.

Feedback about the registered manager was positive. Staff could describe the values of the service and records showed they were emphasised in staff induction, supervision sessions and at team meetings.

A range of audits were used to monitor the safety and quality of the service, of which the provider had oversight. People using other services run by the provider had undertaken an inspection and audit at Hilltop View.

People and their relatives had opportunities to feedback about the service at Hilltop View. Staff had regular meetings where their contribution to the service was recognised by the registered manager.