• Doctor
  • GP practice

East Enfield Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

188, High Street, Enfield, EN3 4EZ (020) 8344 9710

Provided and run by:
Dr Mohammed Abedi

Assessment report published 23 February 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

2 February 2026

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

This is the first inspection for this service since its registration with CQC. This key question has been rated good.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

All staff had contributed to the development of the practice vision and strategy, which was kept under review. Staff were encouraged to talk about this openly in staff meetings and one to one meetings if they felt there were issues or thought changes could be made. The practice was aware of the projected increase in the local population and was working with partner agencies to address future challenges.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us leaders in the practice were approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the practice. We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

The practice hadestablishedFreedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw examples where staff had used the arrangements in place to positive effect.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. We saw evidence of where senior leaders had addressed concerns related to discrimination. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued, for example,we saw adjustments to support disabled staff were in place.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews. The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.Audits were carried out to ensure sustained improvement.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.

The provider worked with other practices within their primary care network to offer extended access, and flu and covid vaccination programmes. The practice took part in regular meetings with members of the Primary Care Network (PCN) to look at trends and how changes to service could be implemented and to work on joint projects such as flu vaccination programmes. The Patient Participation Group (PPG) actively provide feedback from patients on a regular basis.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focussed on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research. This focused on improving patient access to appointments through the implementation of the Total Triage system. The practice also continued to put systems in place to improve the uptake for the cervical and childhood immunisation programmes. Quality improvement audits were carried out regularly. There was enhanced collaboration through regular meetings with community services to provide learning and a joined-up approach to care.