• Doctor
  • GP practice

East Enfield Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

188, High Street, Enfield, EN3 4EZ (020) 8344 9710

Provided and run by:
Dr Mohammed Abedi

Assessment report published 23 February 2026

On this page

Caring

Good

2 February 2026

We looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

This is the first inspection for this service since its registration with CQC. This key question has been rated as good.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Kindness, compassion and dignity

Score: 3

The service always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Staff treated colleagues from other organisations with kindness and respect.

Arrangements were in place to promote patients’ privacy. National GP Patient Survey data reflected people felt listened to and were treated with kindness. Staff we spoke with understood Gillick competency and there was a process to ensure young adults had control over their own privacy and the amount of parental involvement in managing their care and support.

Treating people as individuals

Score: 3

The service treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. The Patient Participation Group (PPG) worked alongside the practice staff to ensure the practice was aware of individual patient and cultural groups needs. They took account of people’s strengths, abilities, aspirations, culture and unique backgrounds and protected characteristics.

Patients’ personal, cultural, social, religious and equality characteristics needs were understood and met. Patient communication needs were met to enable them to be fully involved in their care.

Independence, choice and control

Score: 3

The service promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care ,treatment and wellbeing.

The practice had a hearing loop and used large print and easy to use information formats as well as a communication board.For those who had specific known needs,an appropriate consultation room was prepared in advance to cater for those needs.Staff helped patients and their carers to access advocacy and community-based services.

Responding to people’s immediate needs

Score: 3

The service listened to and understood people’s needs, views and wishes. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress.

There was a system for appointment triage (total triage) that ensured people with immediate needs had access to services. The total triage appointment system allowed patients to submit requests online or by telephone which enabled clinical staff to prioritise care based on urgency and need.Staff we spoke with knew the process for referral to emergency support, including mental health crisis teams.

Workforce wellbeing and enablement

Score: 3

The service cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

Staff told us they were valued by leaders. Leaders had taken steps to recognise and meet the wellbeing needs of staff, which included the necessary resources and facilities for safe working, such as regular breaks and rest areas. Staff reported being supported if they were struggling at work. We saw team building events were established within the practice.