• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Puretouch Care Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

27 Parsons Green Lane, London, SW6 4HH

Provided and run by:
Puretouch Care Limited

Assessment report published 28 September 2025

On this page

Well-led

Good

14 September 2025

Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

This was the 1st assessment since being registered on 6 March 2023. At this assessment the rating is good.

This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities. The provider’s processes and systems promoted a shared direction and culture. This enabled staff to understand the shared vision, values, and strategy and how their roles helped in achieving them. They were developed through a structured planning process in collaboration with people, staff, and external partners. The processes enabled a well-developed understanding of equality, diversity, and human rights, and they prioritised safe, high-quality, compassionate care.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The provider had inclusive leaders who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider’s processes were transitioning to an electronic system. They contained the required, up to date documentation and information to enable staff to meet people’s needs efficiently, and support them in a caring, friendly, and compassionate way. The management team frequently updated staff after reviewing the available information, in a clear, and understandable way.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

People were able to speak up due to the provider fostering a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. The provider’s processes, procedures and systems encouraged openness, honesty, and transparency. Staff were empowered to drive improvement, by these systems, and encouraged to raise concerns and the value of doing so was promoted.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider’s processes removed bias from practices to ensure equality of opportunity and experience in the workforce. Policy reviews, staff supervision, staff meetings, and the complaints procedure tackled structural and institutional discrimination and bias to achieve a fair culture for all, and prevent and address bullying and harassment. A staff member said, “We are treated equally, fairly and with respect.”

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and shared this securely with others when appropriate. The provider processes and systems stored people's risk assessments, care plans, and daily logs. Data was robustly stored, and that collected was collated and used to update and improve the service provided. Any areas needing improvement were then addressed. There were thorough audits, and the complaints system was regularly monitored and enabled staff and the provider to learn from and improve the service. People, their relatives and staff provided regular feedback to identify if people were receiving the care and support, they needed.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The provider focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement throughout the organisation. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcomes, and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research. There were systems and processes in place to promote, and support learning, improvement, and innovation. The complaints system was regularly monitored and enabled staff and the provider to learn from and improve the service. People, their relatives, and staff provided regular feedback to identify if people were receiving the care and support, they needed.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The provider focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement throughout the organisation. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcomes, and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research. There were systems and processes in place to promote, and support learning, improvement, and innovation. The complaints system was regularly monitored and enabled staff and the provider to learn from and improve the service. People, their relatives, and staff provided regular feedback to identify if people were receiving the care and support, they needed.