• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Oriel Care Home Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

87 Hagley Road, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY8 1QY (01384) 375867

Provided and run by:
Oriel Care Home Limited

All Inspections

21 and 22 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 21st and 22nd October 2015 and was unannounced. Oriel Care Home Limited provides accommodation for up to 29 people who require personal care. They also provide a domiciliary service to people who live in their own home. On the day of our inspection there were 28 people living at the care home and two people were being supported to live independently in the community.

There was a registered manager in post and she was present during our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People in both services were positive about the care they received and they all told us they felt safe. People told us that staff knew them well and supported them in their preferred way. We saw that staff had developed a good rapport with people who uses the services. People that lived in the care home commented on the homely atmosphere within the home.

The staff had a clear awareness and understanding of potential abuse and knew how to protect people from the risk of harm. There was enough skilled and experienced staff to meet people’s needs in both services. Staff was recruited in a safe way which ensured they were of a good character to work with people who used these services.

Risk assessments and care plans had been developed with the involvement of people. Staff had the relevant information on how to minimise identified risks to ensure people were supported in a safe way. People had equipment in place when this was needed, so that staff could assist them safely.

The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff knew about people’s individual capacity to make decisions and supported people to make their own decisions.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and respect and staff promoted people’s independence and right to privacy. People were supported to maintain good health; we saw that staff alerted health care professionals if they had any concerns about their health. People knew how to make a complaint and were confident that their complaint would be fully investigated and action taken if necessary.

People described the management team of the home as approachable and they said they felt the services were well managed. Arrangements were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the services, so that actions could be put in place to drive improvement. The management of the service was open and transparent.

29 January 2014

During a routine inspection

There were 28 people living at the home and four people being supported by the domiciliary service on the day of the inspection. We spoke with seven people, two visitors, eight staff, and the manager.

We found that people supported by the home and the domiciliary service had their needs assessed, and care plans were in place. All of the people and relatives we spoke with told us they were happy with the care and support provided. One person said, 'I'm happy and content here. It's a lovely home and the staff are caring people. They talk to me making sure that I get all the help and care that I need.' Another person told us, 'It's a good home to be in, but I'm very independent and have little support from the staff. They are very kind and treat me as a person not a resident.'

People received sufficient food and drink which met their needs and preferences.

We found that sufficient staff were available to meet people's needs.

We found that systems were in place for assessing and monitoring the quality of the service provided.

11 March 2013

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we spoke with 11 people who used the service, the deputy manager and two staff. People we spoke with were complimentary about the care and support that they received. People said: 'I have settled in ok and I am very happy', and it is: 'Great here'.

People told us that they felt involved in any decisions that needed to be made about their care and these were made in their best interests.

We found that proper steps had been taken to ensure that individualised care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare.

We found that medicines were prescribed and given to people appropriately to ensure that they were managed safely.

Staff had been recruited in an appropriate way and checks had been undertaken to ensure that they were suitable to care for vulnerable people. People said staff were: 'Very friendly and nice, they make us laugh', and the staff were: 'Smashing'.

We found that any comments and complaints people made were responded to appropriately to ensure that people were listened to.

The provider is also registered to carry out the regulated activity of personal care to people in their own homes. The deputy manager confirmed that at the time of the inspection they were not providing personal care for anyone in their own home. This meant that we were unable to inspect the provider against this regulated activity.

13 March 2012

During a routine inspection

There were 28 people living at the home on the day of the visit and no one knew we would be visiting. We spoke to nine people who live at the home, one relative and three staff.

Before we visited the home, Dudley local authority told us that they had not had any concerns about the home and said 'Care at Oriel is of a good standard'.

Everyone we spoke to on the day we visited was very complimentary about the home and we did not receive any negative comments. People told us that they were happy with the care received and one person said 'The care is second to none'.

We saw that people were offered choices and their opinions about their daily lives and the home were sought and listened to.

A variety of activities are offered and one person said 'We never sit here looking at the four walls'.

There is a varied menu in place and people told us that they were given choices about the food. People said 'The food is marvelous and I always say so' and 'I always enjoy my dinner, the day I don't they can take me away'.

We saw that staff receive training to ensure they have the knowledge and skills to meet people's individual needs. Staff spoken to clearly knew the needs of the people who lived at the home and they knew how to support them.

People told us that they knew how to raise any concerns if they had any, however all the people we spoke to told us that they did not have any concerns.

There was a very welcoming, friendly, lively and homely atmosphere at the home and a relative confirmed that the home was always like this.