Updated
19 November 2025
Date of assessment: 30 September 2025. North Bristol Private Hospital provides a range of cosmetic surgical services. This was the first assessment of the service and it was rated as Good. In our assessment of surgical services, we found the service had a good safety culture. The environment was safe, clean and fit for purpose. The service monitored all people’s care and treatment to enable continuous improvement and delivered effective evidence-based care and treatment. Staff communicated with patients with genuine kindness and compassion and protected patients’ dignity. The service worked to ensure that everyone could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. The service was well-led with leaders who were visible and approachable.
At this assessment we identified the service was preparing food in the same room where there was laundry. However since the inspection we have received evidence showing the provider has moved the laundry equipment into a different room.
Updated
13 June 2025
Date of Assessment: 30 September 2025.
We conducted a comprehensive onsite assessment visit of the location North Bristol Private Hospital which was operated by EP Surgical Ltd as the service had previously not been inspected. We assessed quality statements from the safe, effective, responsive, caring and well-led key questions. We rated the service as Good.
North Bristol Private Hospital is located in the Bristol area and provides independent plastic surgery and aesthetic treatments to members of the public on a self-referral basis. The non-surgical treatments do not fall within the CQC scope of registration and will not be reported on. The service is registered for surgical procedures, diagnostic and screening procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury.
The clinic had a spacious reception area, a range of offices, consultation and treatment rooms and two operating theatres. There are 3 ensuite-patient rooms for patients who required an overnight stay.
In our assessment of surgical services, we found the service had a good safety culture. The environment was safe, clean and fit for purpose. The service monitored all people’s care and treatment to enable continuous improvement and delivered effective evidence-based care and treatment. Staff communicated with patients with genuine kindness and compassion and protected patients’ dignity. The service worked to ensure that everyone could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. The service was well-led with leaders who were visible and approachable
The registered manager, who was the hospital director, had been in post for 6 months at the time of inspection. This was the first inspection of the service.