• Doctor
  • GP practice

The University Health Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Sand Street, Huddersfield, HD1 3AL (01484) 430386

Provided and run by:
Huddersfield University Health Centre Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 17 and 18 June 2025. The University Health Centre is situated in a 2-storey, purpose-built medical centre in the vicinity of the Huddersfield University Campus at Sand Street, Huddersfield, HD1 3AL. Patient services are delivered from the first and second floor.

The practice is situated within NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) and delivers a Primary Medical Services (PMS) contract to a predominantly student population of approximately 14,600 patients. The practice is in the Tolson Primary Care Network (PCN) with 7 other practices.

The provider is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to deliver the Regulated Activities: diagnostic and screening procedures; maternity and midwifery services; treatment of disease, disorder or injury; family planning and surgical procedures.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the third decile (3 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 63% White, 21% Asian, 7% Black, 5% Mixed and 4% Other. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

We carried out this announced, focused assessment to follow-up on areas that required improvement and were in breach of regulation at our previous inspection in December 2023. At that inspection we found there were gaps in systems and processes to ensure safe recruitment, premises, medicines management and the management of some patients with long-term conditions. This assessment reviewed all quality statements in the key questions of safe and effective and 2 priority quality statements in the responsive and well-led key questions.

Since the last inspection, the practice has made improvements and is no longer in breach of regulation. The practice has now been rated good for providing safe and effective services and is rated good overall.

 

4 and 6 December 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The University Health Centre on 4 and 6 December 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Safe – Requires Improvement

Effective – Requires Improvement

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection in line with our current inspection priorities.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • Reviewing staff questionnaires.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • There were gaps in systems and processes to ensure safe recruitment, premises, medicines management and the management of some patients with long-term conditions.
  • There were systems in place to safeguard children and vulnerable adults from abuse and staff we spoke with knew how to identify and report safeguarding concerns.
  • The practice participated in various quality improvement initiatives to drive improvements and patient outcomes.
  • The practice was a training practice and had a strong emphasis on education and learning.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The provider demonstrated there was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership at all levels.

We found one breach of regulation. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

In addition, the provider should:

  • Continue to monitor and make improvements to increase the uptake of cancer screening and childhood immunisations.
  • Continue to review and improve the identification of carers on the practice register.
  • Continue to monitor patient outcomes for access.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care