• Care Home
  • Care home

Shrublands

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Faringdon Road, Cumnor, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 9QY (01865) 865363

Provided and run by:
Ms Jane Quartermain

All Inspections

18 October 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Shrublands is a residential home providing accommodation for up to 9 people who require nursing or personal care. On the day of our inspection 8 people were living at the home.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People living at Shrublands received safe care from skilled and knowledgeable staff. Staff knew how to identify and report any concerns. People lived in a safe, homely environment where staff were able to interact with them throughout the day.

Risks to people's safety and well-being were managed through a risk management process. There were sufficient staff deployed to meet people's needs.

Medicines were managed safely, and people received their medicines as prescribed. The provider had installed an electronic system to manage medicines and care plans which enabled medicines to be managed safely.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The home was well-led by a registered manager who was committed to improving people's quality of life. We received positive feedback about the management of the home from people, relatives and staff. They had effective quality assurance processes which were used to improve people’s care. The service had a clear management and staffing structure in place and staff worked well as a team. Staff worked well with external social and health care professionals.

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 13 December 2017)

Why we inspected

We undertook this inspection as part of a random selection of services rated Good and Outstanding.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Shrublands on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

16 November 2017

During a routine inspection

We undertook an unannounced inspection of Shrublands on 16 November 2017.

The Shrublands is a family owned and managed residential home that provides personal care and accommodation for up to nine older people. Some people may have varying types and degrees of dementia. On the day of our inspection nine people were living at the home.

At the last inspection, the service was rated Good.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good overall.

Why the service is rated Good:

People remained safe living in the home. There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and staff had time to spend with people. Risk assessments were carried out and promoted positive risk taking which enable people to live their lives as they chose. People received their medicines safely and the registered manager had made improvements to medicines guidance since our last inspection.

People continued to receive effective care from staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them and meet their needs. People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the procedures in the service supported this practice. People were supported to access health professionals when needed and staff worked closely with people's GPs to ensure their health and well-being was monitored.

The service continued to provide support in a caring way. Staff supported people with kindness and compassion. Staff respected people as individuals and treated them with dignity. People were involved in decisions about their care needs and the support they required to meet those needs.

The service continued to be responsive to people's needs and ensured people were supported in a personalised way. People's changing needs were responded to promptly. People had access to a variety of activities that met their individual needs.

The service was led by a registered manager who promoted a service that put people at the forefront of all the service did. There was a positive culture that valued people, relatives and staff and promoted a caring ethos.

The registered manager monitored the quality of the service and looked for continuous improvement. There was a clear vision to deliver high-quality care and support and promote a positive culture that was person-centred, open, inclusive and empowering which achieved good outcomes for people.

22 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 22 October 2015. It was an unannounced inspection. The service had met all of the outcomes we inspected against at our last inspection on 18 June 2013.

The Shrublands is a residential home that provides care for up to seven older people. Some people may have varying types and degrees of dementia. On the day of our inspection seven people were living at the home.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were not always safe. Staff understood how to recognise and report concerns and the service worked with the local authority if there were any concerns. People received their medicines safely as prescribed. However, protocols in relation to PRN (used as needed) medicines were not in place. Staff assessed risks associated with people's care and took action to reduce risk.

Staff understood the needs of people, particularly those living with dementia, and provided care with kindness and compassion. People spoke positively about the home and the care they received. Staff took time to talk with people and provide activities such as and arts and crafts, games and religious services.

The registered manager and staff were aware of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) which governs decision-making on behalf of adults who may not be able to make particular decisions themselves.

People told us they were confident they would be listened to and action would be taken. The service had systems to assess the quality of the service provided in the home. Learning was identified and action taken to make improvements which improved people’s safety and quality of life. Systems were in place that ensured people were protected against the risks of unsafe or inappropriate care.

People’s opinions were sought and acted upon to improve the service. Regular surveys were sent to people and their relatives and the results analysed. Where people and their relatives had made practical suggestions they were adopted to improve the service.

All staff spoke positively about the support they received from the registered manager. Staff told us they were approachable and there was a good level of communication within the home. People knew the registered manager and spoke to them openly and with confidence.

The registered manager had systems in place to monitor the quality of service and look for continuous improvement. Accidents and incidents were investigated and learning shared amongst the staff to prevent reoccurrence. The registered manager’s vision of a ‘family home’ was shared by the staff.

18 June 2013

During a routine inspection

The home was providing care to seven people and employed seven care workers at the time of our inspection.

We found that people's privacy, dignity and independence were respected. One relative told us, ''I really like the fact that the home allows people to take risks. People are not kept out of the kitchen or laundry because it might be unsafe. People are supported to take part in the daily domestic activities whilst care workers keep them safe''. We observed that care workers interacted with people in a sensitive and professional manner.

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. One person and four relatives we spoke with all made positive comments about their experience of the home and the care delivered. Care workers were responsive to people's changing needs and care was adjusted as required.

We found that improvements had been made to the home's safeguarding protocols. A system was in place to prevent financial abuse and to identify any discrepancies quickly.

We found that people were cared for by care workers who were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard. Improvements had been made to the induction and supervision arrangements. One care worker we spoke with told us ''we can ask the manager at any time to book us on one of the induction sessions''.

We saw that the home had introduced new needs assessment and care planning records. People's care records were detailed and accurate. Two care workers we spoke with confirmed that there had been an improvement in the quality of care records. They both told us that records were now very clear and that ''you know exactly what you need to do to support someone in the right way''.

7 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to two people who use service during our visit. Both people told us that they were being looked after well by the staff and that they had been with the provider for a while. One person told us that the staff were nice to her and helped her with her family. She told us that she was happy living with other people as she found this interesting as they all had different backgrounds. She started that she did not have any problems and was aware that staff were available to support her with her daily needs as she was getting on. Another person told us that staff were very helpful in ensuring that her nails were kept neat and clean. She told us that she had her nails done every week as she played the piano for other people hence needed her nails looking nice.

We also spoke with three staff members during the visit. All the staff we spoke with told us that they felt supported and enjoyed their work. Staff told us that although it could be challenging they could rely on each and the knowledge of people using the service ensured that they could support and care for people well. Staff told us that they received regular training which was relevant to their area of work which was beneficial to their professional development and care being delivered to people.