• Care Home
  • Care home


Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Faringdon Road, Cumnor, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 9QY (01865) 865363

Provided and run by:
Ms Jane Quartermain

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 13 December 2017

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 16 November 2017 and was unannounced. The inspection was carried out by one inspector.


Before the inspection, we asked the provider complete a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. Due to technical problems, the registered manager was not able to complete a Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We looked at previous inspection reports and notifications we had received. Notifications are certain events that providers are required by law to tell us about.

All the people at the home were living with dementia and had difficulty speaking with us. However, we spoke with two people, three relatives, two care staff, the registered manager and the provider. We also spoke with a visiting GP.

During the inspection we looked at four people’s care plans, three staff files, medicine records and other records relating to the management of the service. We observed care practice throughout the inspection. We also used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

Overall inspection


Updated 13 December 2017

We undertook an unannounced inspection of Shrublands on 16 November 2017.

The Shrublands is a family owned and managed residential home that provides personal care and accommodation for up to nine older people. Some people may have varying types and degrees of dementia. On the day of our inspection nine people were living at the home.

At the last inspection, the service was rated Good.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good overall.

Why the service is rated Good:

People remained safe living in the home. There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and staff had time to spend with people. Risk assessments were carried out and promoted positive risk taking which enable people to live their lives as they chose. People received their medicines safely and the registered manager had made improvements to medicines guidance since our last inspection.

People continued to receive effective care from staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them and meet their needs. People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the procedures in the service supported this practice. People were supported to access health professionals when needed and staff worked closely with people's GPs to ensure their health and well-being was monitored.

The service continued to provide support in a caring way. Staff supported people with kindness and compassion. Staff respected people as individuals and treated them with dignity. People were involved in decisions about their care needs and the support they required to meet those needs.

The service continued to be responsive to people's needs and ensured people were supported in a personalised way. People's changing needs were responded to promptly. People had access to a variety of activities that met their individual needs.

The service was led by a registered manager who promoted a service that put people at the forefront of all the service did. There was a positive culture that valued people, relatives and staff and promoted a caring ethos.

The registered manager monitored the quality of the service and looked for continuous improvement. There was a clear vision to deliver high-quality care and support and promote a positive culture that was person-centred, open, inclusive and empowering which achieved good outcomes for people.