• Care Home
  • Care home

Gowlands

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Sutton Bridge Farm, Sutton Road, Rochford, Essex, SS4 1XS (01702) 541761

Provided and run by:
Hamelin Trust

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 27 August 2025

Date of Assessment: 2 September 2025 to 16 September 2025.

This service is a residential home providing short stay respite care to people with a learning disability and autistic people. The service is able to accommodate up to 9 people staying at the same time.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider had processes in place to investigate safeguarding concerns. However, incidents and accidents were not always robustly monitored and reviewed to ensure all appropriate actions were taken. Not all risks to people’s health and safety had been assessed and recorded to ensure staff had detailed guidance about how to manage risks to people safely. There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs. Staff worked well together and understood how people liked to be supported. However, the provider had not always ensured staff recruitment and training processes were monitored robustly.

Staff and leaders had a shared vision and culture which placed people at the centre of the service. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive. At the time of the inspection, leaders were still in the process of embedding governance processes following a period of management and staffing changes. We found the provider’s governance processes were not yet implemented effectively and this meant safety and quality issues in the service were not always promptly identified and addressed. However, the provider was responsive to feedback given during the inspection, taking immediate action to make improvements and address concerns.

Staff managed people’s medicines safely. People were treated with kindness and compassion, and staff protected their privacy and dignity. People were treated as individuals and staff supported them in line with their preferences. Staff responded to people in a timely way to minimise any distress or discomfort.

People received fair and equal care. The provider worked in partnership with other health professionals to promote good outcomes for people. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living and identify any changes or concerns.

The provider supported staff wellbeing. Staff felt encouraged to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and were given the time and resources to try new ideas to continuously improve people’s experience of care.

 

People's experience of the service

Updated 27 August 2025

People and those important to them told us staff were kind and caring. Relatives told us they felt people were safe. They said staff understood people’s needs and knew how they liked to be supported.

Comments included, “Staff are friendly, caring and kind”, “[Person] is well looked after. There are specific staff that know [person] very well and there is consistency” and “[Person] is very safe. Staff 100% understand them, especially the familiar staff.”

People’s relatives told us they knew how to raise concerns and how to make a complaint. However, we received a mixed response from relatives about how well the provider communicated with them and relatives told us they were not always asked for their feedback.

We received mixed feedback about whether people were encouraged to engage in meaningful activities and go out to do the activities they enjoyed. Comments included, “It seems they don’t do much with [person]”, “[Person] is always in front of the television” and “They have a lovely garden, but I’m not sure they do much”.

Despite these concerns, relatives we spoke to told us people were generally happy to use the service and appeared to enjoy their stays. They told us people liked being supported by a consistent and experienced staff team and they enjoyed their stay more when they were there with staff they knew well.

Some people could not directly tell us about their experience. We used a structured observation tool to assess whether they received good care. This approach showed us people were supported to make choices and were listened to. Staff consistently interacted positively with people during our observations.