• Doctor
  • GP practice

Cannock Road Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

60-62 Cannock Road, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 8PJ (01902) 739973

Provided and run by:
Dr Libberton, Ram & Gulati

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 25 February 2016

Cannock Road Medical Practice located in Wolverhampton provides medical services to approximately 6,900 patients. The practice is easily accessible by varied public transport links or car. Off road parking is available at nearby designated roadside parking areas. Following the merger of two practices in March 2014 the GP partners made a decision to extend the practice located at Cannock Road. The work is expected to be completed early this year and will provide improved facilities for patients that use the service. This includes an improved waiting area, access for patients who use a wheelchair, larger consulting and treatment rooms and more car parking spaces at the rear of the practice.

The practice team consists of two GP partners and one salaried GP, (one male and two female), who provide services which equate to two whole time equivalent GPs. The practice also use regular GP locums to support the clinicians and meet the needs of patients at the practice. The clinical practice team includes a practice manager, an advanced nurse practitioner who is also a prescriber, a practice nurse and two healthcare assistants. There are nine practice support staff, seven receptionists/administration staff, two secretaries, an administration apprentice and a cleaner. In total there are 12 staff employed either full or part time hours.

The practice is open between 8am to 6.30pm Monday to Friday. Appointments are from 8.30am to 11.00am and 3.30pm to 6pm Monday to Friday. Extended surgery hours are from 6pm to 7.20pm on Tuesdays. The practice does not provide an out-of-hours service to its patients but has alternative arrangements for patients to be seen when the practice is closed . Patients are directed to the out of hours service Primecare, the NHS 111 service and the local Walk-in Centres.

The practice has a contract to provide Primary Medical Services (PMS) for patients. This is a contract for the practice to deliver primary medical services to the local community. They provide Directed Enhanced Services, such as the childhood vaccination and immunisation scheme and minor surgery. The practice provides a number of clinics for example long-term condition management including asthma, diabetes and high blood pressure.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Cannock Road Medical Practice on Wednesday 6 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and to report incidents and near misses. There was an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • An easy read (pictorial) letter was sent to patients with a learning disability inviting them to attend the practice for their annual health check.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Consider a system to demonstrate that appropriate learning from significant events has been shared appropriately with staff and external stakeholders.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions. Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority. Performance for diabetes assessment and care was much lower than the  national average (68.6% as compared to the national average of 89.2%). The practice had taken action to identify the causes and it planned to be involved in a local CCG initiative to improve the care and treatment of patients with diabetes. Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed.  All these patients had a named GP and a structured annual review to check their health and medicines needs were being met. For those patients with the most complex needs, the named GP worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care. Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people. There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk, for example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. Immunisation rates were relatively high for all standard childhood immunisations. Data showed that 76.51% of patients on the practice register had had an asthma review in the last 12 months. Patients told us that children and young people were treated in an age-appropriate way and were recognised as individuals, and we saw evidence to confirm this. Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies. We saw positive examples of joint working with midwives. The practice’s uptake for the cervical screening programme was 78.12%, which was comparable to the national average of 81.83%.

Older people

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people. The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population. The practice offered home visits and urgent appointments for those older patients with enhanced needs. Nationally reported data showed that outcomes for patients were good for conditions commonly found in older people. The practice had a proactive working relationship with seven nursing/independent care homes. There was effective communication between the practice and care home staff and visits to the homes were made when requested.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of working-age people (including those recently retired and students). The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible, flexible and offered continuity of care. The practice appointment telephone line was open between 8.30am and 6.30pm and extended hours were offered one evening per week. The practice was proactive in offering online services as well as a full range of health promotion and screening that reflected the needs for this age group.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). The data showed that 91.67% of patients on the practice register who experienced poor mental health had a comprehensive agreed care plan in the preceding 12 months. This was comparable to the national average of 88.47%. The practice had told patients experiencing poor mental health about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations. The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of people who experienced poor mental health, including those with dementia. It carried out advance care planning for patients with dementia. The percentage of patients diagnosed with dementia whose care had been reviewed in a face to face review in the preceding 12 months was 85%, which was comparable to the national average of 84.01%. Staff had a good understanding of how to support people with mental health needs and dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 25 February 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. The practice held a register of patients with a learning disability and carried out annual health checks for these patients. An easy read (pictorial) letter was sent to patients with a learning disability inviting them to attend the practice for their annual health check.

Staff had been trained to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies. The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of vulnerable people. It had told vulnerable patients about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations.