• Care Home
  • Care home

Longview

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Little Gypps Road, Canvey Island, Essex, SS8 9HG (01268) 682906

Provided and run by:
Runwood Homes Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Longview on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Longview, you can give feedback on this service.

29 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Longview is a residential care home providing personal care to up 70 people. The service provides support to older people some of whom maybe living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 62 people using the service. The service is set over two levels and people can use lifts to move around to the multiple lounges and communal areas. There is also access to outside space and gardens.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

people we spoke with were happy using the service and complimentary of the staff. One person said, "It is perfect here the staff are so good."

Care and treatment were planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. People were cared for safely by staff who had been recruited and employed after appropriate checks had been completed. Staff had received appropriate training. There were systems in place to minimise the risk of infection and to learn lessons from accidents and incidents. Medication was dispensed by staff who had received training to do so.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The registered manager had put systems in place to monitor and provide good care and these were reviewed on a regular basis.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was good (published 11 November 2019). At this inspection the service has remained good.

Why we inspected: The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about safeguarding referrals not being raised and how the service responded to falls. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe and well led sections of this full report.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

26 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Longview is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 70 people aged 65 and over. At the time of the inspection 70 people were living at the service, this included people living with dementia.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People we spoke with told us they felt happy and safe living at Longview.

Systems were in place to safeguard people from harm and risks were assessed appropriately. There were enough trained staff to meet people’s needs and people’s medicines were administered safely.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were knowledgeable and caring and treated people with dignity and respect. People and their relatives spoke positively about the care and support received.

People’s care was personalised and people were supported to take part in a range of different activities which were meaningful to them. People knew how to raise concerns and told us they felt confident these would be addressed when raised. The service worked with other health professionals to meet people’s needs.

People and relatives spoke highly of the manager and the positive culture created by the management team. Staff told us they felt supported by the manager. Quality monitoring processes were in place to assess and improve the service.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 10 February 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

18 January 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 18 and 25 January 2017. Longview is a residential care home for up to 70 older people some of whom may be living with dementia. When we inspected there were 68 people living in the service.

At our last inspection, the service was rated good and at this inspection we found the service remained good.

The service was safe. People received a safe service and were protected from the risk of harm. There were enough staff that had been safely recruited to help keep people safe and meet their needs. Medication management was good and people received their medication as prescribed.

The service was effective. People were cared for by experienced and well trained staff. The service ensured that people had the support they needed to have as much choice and control over their lives in the least restrictive way possible. People received sufficient food and drink to meet their needs and preferences and their healthcare needs were met.

The service was caring. Staff knew the people they cared for well and were kind, caring and compassionate in their approach. People were encouraged and supported to remain as independent as possible. Staff ensured that people were treated with dignity and respect and their privacy was maintained at all times.

The service was responsive. People were fully involved in the assessment and care planning process. Their care plans had been regularly reviewed to reflect their changing needs. People were encouraged and supported to participate in a range of activities to suit their individual interests. Complaints were dealt with appropriately in a timely way.

The service was well-led. People were positive about the quality of the service. The registered manager and staff were committed to providing people with good quality person centred care that met their needs and preferences. There were good systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and to drive improvements. The service met all relevant fundamental standards.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

17 February 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 17 February 2015. Longview is one of a number of services owned and run by Runwood Homes Limited. Longview provides support and personal care for up to 70 older people. People living at the service may have care needs associated with dementia. At the time of our inspection 70 people were living at the service.

The service had an established registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe. The provider had taken steps to identify the possibility of abuse happening through ensuring staff had a good understanding of the issues and had access to information and training.

The service ensured that people were cared for as safely as possible through assessing risk and having plans in place for managing people’s care.

People were treated with kindness and respect by a sufficient number of staff who were available to them when they needed support. People and their friends and families were very happy with the care that was provided at the service.

Staff demonstrated knowledge and skills in carrying out their role. Staff were properly recruited before they started work at the service to ensure their suitability for the role. They received initial and ongoing training and support to help ensure that they had the right skills to support people effectively.

People were supported with their medication in a way that met their needs. There were safe systems in place for receiving, administering and disposing of medicines.

Staff interacted with people in a caring, respectful and professional manner. Where people were not always able to express their needs verbally we saw that staff responded to their non-verbal requests and had an understanding of their individual care and support needs.

The manager has a good knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS.) DoLS are a code of practice to supplement the main Mental Capacity Act 2005. These safeguards protect the rights of adults by ensuring that if there are restrictions on their freedom and liberty these are assessed by appropriately trained professionals.

People were supported to be able to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs. People told us they liked the food and were provided with a variety of meals.

People’s care needs were assessed and planned for. Care plans and risk assessments were in place so that staff would have information and understand how to care for people safely and in ways that they preferred. People’s healthcare needs were monitored, and assistance was sought from other professionals so that they were supported to maintain their health and wellbeing.

People had opportunities to participate in activities to suit their individual needs and interests. Care tasks were carried out in ways that respected people’s privacy and dignity.

Systems were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. People’s views were sought and audits were carried out to identify any improvements needed.

6 January 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

Prior to our inspection concerns had been raised by an anonymous source regarding the care and welfare of the people living at Longview. Issues included people being assisted to bed by 19:00, people not being assisted to the toilet when needed and sitting in faeces and urine. They also included people not being bathed for showered for up to three weeks, people not receiving the correct pressure care, urine and faeces in the corridors and a poor level of care being provided.

Two relatives spoken with were generally happy with the care and support provided by the service. They felt that when they had raised issues that staff and management had been responsive and acted to address their issues.

You can see our judgements on the front page of this report.

3 June 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with were happy with the care they received at Longview. Those spoken with stated they had been involved in organising their care and received the care they needed. Relatives spoken with added that they had been provided with sufficient information about the home and that an assessment had been completed to ensure the home could meet their relatives care needs.

Those people who were unable to communicate were observed during the day and their body language and facial expressions were noted and people appeared relaxed with staff. Staff were observed speaking with people with dignity and respect and involving them in their care. Staff were observed interacting with people and there was a homely atmosphere. Feedback from people spoken with included 'I could not ask for more,' 'Excellent care' and 'They are marvellous.'

An Expert by Experience assisted on the day of the visit and their finding included 'I thoroughly enjoyed my day at Longview, and was grateful for the warm welcome I received from the management and all members of staff. I was happy to see the care provided, and the warm social atmosphere in which residents were able to live. Throughout my time at Longview, I was impressed by the care delivered by all members of staff. Carers were patient, supportive and attentive to the needs of those living in the home. People generally looked clean, well dressed, and well cared for.

8 May 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with were happy with the care they received at Longview. Each person had an individual personalised care plan, which identified their care needs and choices. People spoken with stated that the carers provided any care they needed. Staff were observed speaking with people with dignity and respect and involving them in their care. People appeared relaxed with staff and were viewed helping them to make choices on how they wanted their care provided. Staff spoken with confirmed they had enough staff to cover the care required and during our visit at no time were people seen waiting for their care.

People told us they were happy with the care they received from the staff and knew how to raise any concerns they may have. Comments we received included 'We are well catered for,' 'X has settled in well,' 'I have not complaints' and 'I am happy.'

22 September 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People who use the service told us that they had been involved in their plan of care and that they felt well treated and respected by the staff at Longview. They were happy with the care they received and most felt they received the care they needed. Comments included 'I've been treated with respect and dignity' and 'Very professional - looking after medical needs.'

People said they liked the food and they were offered a choice of meals. Comments included 'The food is really good', 'Tasty' and 'Really nice.' Whilst observing at lunchtime the meal looked hot and nice and people were offered a good size portion of food. People told us they enjoyed joining in the activities arranged by the Activity Co-ordinator.

People with whom we spoke stated that the home was clean and tidy and they had no concerns. They felt the home was well decorated and comments included 'I am impressed by the facilities and you are made to feel very welcome' and 'We are always made to feel welcome.' The furnishing and furniture was of a good quality and people had been able to personalise their bedrooms with pictures and personal belongings.