• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Hebron Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

46 Rollesbrook Gardens, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 5WB (023) 8235 7993

Provided and run by:
Methodist Homes

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Our view of the service

About the service

The service provided care and support to people living in their own home. At the time of the inspection, 7 people were receiving a regulated activity.

Who the service is for

Herborn Court is a domiciliary care service that supports people to live independently within their own homes. The service provides personal care and support to people living in the local community, enabling them to maintain their independence and remain in familiar surroundings.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates the personal care provided by the service. This inspection therefore focused on the provision of personal care and the experiences of people receiving that support.

CQC only inspects services provided to people who receive 'personal care', such as assistance with personal hygiene and eating. Where relevant, we also consider the wider social care people receive.

The service provides personal care and support to people who require assistance with daily living activities. At the time of our inspection, nine people were receiving support. Their needs varied and included support for physical frailty, long-term health conditions, and age-related memory loss.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment between the 21 July and the 19 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's individual needs and received appropriate training, supervision and support to deliver safe, effective and person-centred care. They were able to adapt their approach to reflect individual preferences, promote independence and respond to changing needs.

Care plans and risk assessments were reviewed regularly to ensure support remained appropriate and responsive. Staff worked in partnership with healthcare professionals, relatives and other agencies to promote positive outcomes and support people's wellbeing.

Leaders demonstrated a clear understanding of their regulatory responsibilities and promoted an open, inclusive and community-focused culture. People were encouraged to maintain relationships, access community resources and make choices about their daily lives, while staff felt supported and understood the service's values.

Effective safeguarding arrangements were in place to protect people from abuse, neglect and avoidable harm. Staff understood how to recognise, report and escalate concerns, and safeguarding responsibilities were reinforced through ongoing training and supervision.

Robust governance and quality assurance systems helped monitor the safety and quality of the service. Regular audits, oversight activities and feedback from people, relatives and staff were used to identify improvements and drive service development.

Appropriate risk management and emergency planning arrangements supported the safe delivery of care and continuity of service. Risks were regularly reviewed to ensure people received timely support while maintaining their independence.

The provider worked in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Staff understood the importance of consent and supported people to make their own decisions wherever possible, ensuring their rights, choices and preferences remained central to the care they received.

7 March 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

• Hebron Court is a retirement living community where people have their own flats. Methodist Homes provides home care services to people who require support with personal care.

• At the time of our inspection there were 19 people who received personal care services in their own flats.

• The service focused on supporting people to live independently in their own homes.

• People supported included older people who might be living with dementia, physical disability or sensory impairment.

People’s experience of using this service:

• People received a service that was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.

• The service had the characteristics of a good service in all areas.

• One person we spoke with said it was “overall a good service with high standards”.

• There were effective processes in place to keep people safe and learn lessons to improve the service if things went wrong.

• Staff received training and support to maintain the skills required to support people according to their needs and choices.

• Staff supported people, including those with a sensory impairment, to take part in decisions about their care.

• The provider worked with other agencies and professionals to achieve good outcomes for people in line with their needs and preferences.

Rating at last inspection:

• At the last inspection (published 10 June 2016) we rated the service good.

Why we inspected:

• This was a planned inspection to check the service remained good.

Follow up:

• We did not identify any concerns at this inspection. We will therefore re-inspect this service within our published timeframe for services rated good. We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the Care Quality Commisssion (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk.

12 April 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 12 April 2016 and was announced. The provider was given 24 hours because the location provides a domiciliary care service; we need to be sure that someone would be available in the office.

Hebron Court provides a personal care service to people who lived in a complex of private apartments within the grounds. Whilst not all people needed any personal care or support, those that did could either choose to make their own arrangements or use the personal care service provided by Hebron court staff. . When we visited five people were using the service and receiving support with their personal care. Other people who lived at Hebron Court could receive care and support should they need it in an emergency.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The service was currently in the process of registering the manager for the regulated activity of personal care.

We received positive feedback from people about the service. People who used the service expressed great satisfaction and spoke very highly of the staff.

People told us they felt safe and secure when receiving care. Staff received training in safeguarding adults and child protection for when they came into contact with children. Safe recruitment practices were followed and appropriate checks were undertaken, which helped make sure only suitable staff were employed to care for people in their own homes. There were sufficient numbers of care workers to maintain the schedule of care visits. Staff told us they felt supported and received regular supervisions and support. Staff meetings were held every other month.

People’s risk assessments and those relating to their home environment were detailed and helped reduce risks to people while maintaining their independence. People were supported to receive their medicines safely from suitably trained staff.

People who used the service felt they were treated with kindness and said their privacy and dignity was respected. People were supported to eat and drink when needed and staff contacted healthcare professionals when required. Staff had an understanding of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and were clear that people had the right to make their own choices.

People felt listened to and a complaints procedure was in place. Regular audits of the service were carried out to asses and monitor the quality of the service. Staff felt supported by the registered manager and felt they could visit the office any time and be listened to.