• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: TRU (Transitional Rehabilitation Unit) Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Margaret House, 342 Haydock Lane, Haydock, St Helens, Merseyside, WA11 9UY (01942) 707000

Provided and run by:
TRU (Transitional Rehabilitation Unit) Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 13 May 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 2 and 3 February 2016 and was announced. The inspection was carried out by one adult social care inspector. At the time of our inspection 13 people were receiving a service.

We reviewed the information about TRU Transitional Rehabilitation Unit held by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) such as previous inspection records and notifications we had received from the registered manager. Notifications are required to be sent by the registered provider and inform CQC of any significant events that affect the service or the people who use the service. We were provided with a PIR (providers information return). This is information which we asked the provider to send to us, to help us plan our inspection.

Before our inspection we spoke with the local authority’s safeguarding team and the contracts monitoring team to check if they had identified any concerns or issues on their monitoring visits to the service. No concerns or safeguarding referrals had been received.

During the inspection we went to the registered provider’s office and spoke with the registered manager and eight members of staff. We spoke with three of the people receiving a service at the office and visited two other people in their own homes. During the visits to people’s homes we were also able to speak with staff members who were supporting the people. All of the feedback we received was positive, from the people who received a service and from the members of staff.

We looked at the care records of four people who used the service, including their care plans, risk assessments and other records and documentation regarding their health needs and monitoring.

We looked at the files of four members of staff including recruitment, supervision and training provision. Other records checked included, audits, medication administration records (MAR), quality assurance monitoring survey questionnaires (received from people and their relatives) and policies and procedures including, safeguarding, whistleblowing and recruitment.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 13 May 2016

The inspection took place on 2 & 3 February 2016 and was announced. We gave 72 hours’ notice of the inspection to make sure the staff we needed to speak with were available at the location.

Tru (Transitional Rehabilitation Unit) is a domiciliary care agency, which provides therapeutic and personal care services to people with an acquired brain injury living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 13 people using the service.

There was a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and trusted the support staff. There were systems in place to protect people from harm and keep them safe. Staff were aware of the provider's procedures for reporting any safeguarding concerns.

There were systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. This included gathering the views and opinions of people who used the service and monitoring the quality of service provided.

People’s care and support needs were assessed and care plans were put into place to meet those needs. People’s wishes and preferences were recorded in their care plans. Risks to people’s health and well-being were identified and risk assessments were in place to manage those risks.

Induction training in the Care certificiate standards was provided to new staff.

There was a complaints policy and procedure in place, with records of complaints that the service had received. These had been dealt with appropriately and in the relevant timescales.

People told us they found the management team approachable and there were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service.