You are here

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to adults. At the time of this announced inspection of 14 November 2017 there were 52 people who used the service. We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of our inspection to make sure that someone was available.

At our last inspection of 13 October 2015 the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service continued to provide a safe service to people. This included systems designed to minimise the risks to people, including from abuse. There were systems in place to make sure that there were enough care workers to cover people’s planned care visits. Robust recruitment procedures were in place. Where people required support with their medicines, this was done safely. There were infection control procedures in place to guide care workers in how to minimise the risks of cross infection.

Care workers were trained and supported to meet people’s needs. The service understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2015 and people were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and care workers cared for them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Systems were in place to support people to eat and drink enough, where they required support. People were supported to have access to health professionals where needed. The service worked with other organisations involved in people’s care to provide a consistent service.

Care workers had good relationships with people who used the service. People’s rights to privacy and independence were promoted and respected. People’s views and preferences were listened to and acted on about how they wanted to be cared for and supported.

People received care and support which was assessed, planned and delivered to meet their individual needs. A complaints procedure was in place and complaints were acted upon and used to improve the service.

The service continued to have an open and empowering culture. The service used comments from people and incidents in the service to learn from these to drive improvement. The service had a quality assurance system and shortfalls were identified and addressed. As a result the quality of the service continued to improve.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

The service remains good.

Effective

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

The service remains good.

Caring

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

The service remains good.

Responsive

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

The service remains good.

Well-led

Good

Updated 4 January 2018

The service remains good.